How can you prove that this is the real result of expert trading ? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It is surprising that there is no way to determine whether a trade is manual or expert .
Is it not possible to add an indication of the type of trade (manual or automatic) in the MT history or in the trading signals ?
Or is there?
If you want to show that an Expert Advisor is trading and not a human and you are ready to display this EA in the Market, then simultaneously with the publication of the product you launch a signal, on which this EA will trade with the same settings that are saved by default in the product. After a while, if the results of the signal and the product test from the time of publication coincide (of course, with adjustments for floating spreads, slippages, etc.), then we can confidently conclude that it is the EA, not the person, who trades that is exposed for sale.
The only disadvantage of this method is that you have to trade with fixed settings, with inevitably worse results compared to those that could be obtained in real trading, where periodic optimization (tuning to the market) is performed.
If you want to show that it is the Expert Advisor that is trading, not a human, and you are ready to display this EA in the market, then simultaneously with the publication of the product you start a signal, on which this EA will trade with the same settings that are saved by default in the product. After a while, if the results of the signal and the product test from the time of publication coincide (of course, with adjustments for floating spreads, slippages, etc.), then we can confidently conclude that it is the EA, not the person, who trades that is exposed for sale.
The only disadvantage of this method is that you have to trade with fixed settings, with inevitably worse results compared to those that could be obtained in real trading, where periodic optimization (tuning to the market) is performed.
why prove it?
In the marketplace, where various trading robots are sold, they often show test results on the MT tester. They show how, within a year, $1,000 turns into a million.
And not only the developers of the robots, but also the buyers know very well that this is not true. This is because the testing is not done on real ticks, and therefore the picture is very different on the real.
If there was some way to show the EA's performance on the real ticks, you can easily evaluate it, sell it or buy it.
The marketplace, which sells a variety of trading robots, often shows test results on the MT tester. They show how, within a year, $1,000 turns into a million.
And not only the developers of the robots, but also the buyers know very well that this is not true. This is because the testing is not done on real ticks, and therefore the picture is very different on the real.
If there was some way to show the expert's work on the real, you can easily evaluate, sell or buy it.
The profits made today do not guarantee that YOU will make them tomorrow.
Commas.........
there is of course, hover your mouse over the entry in the report file (preferably on the ticket).
What is surprising is that there is no way to determine whether the result of a trade is manual or expert .
It will be through the build most likely.
It all works - no one disputes that. But the question was: Prove for Investors who don't know such a word and where to look for it, robot work. Obviously, we will have to write a book on the definition and finding of this magic number...
why would an investor want to know whether a robot or a human works?
are such uneducated investors,
and if you want to get an investor, you have to try and not be too lazy to write a talmud.
why know who works as a robot or a human?