If you want to work in a group. - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Can't this be done on the forum? Why a group?
Just remember Borisych's thread on the fourth forum - all in the open, all ideas in the palm of your hand, codes, principles... So? Nobody felt worse. Those who are interested have joined, those who are not interested have passed by. Same group. But the ideas of the group are in the public domain, if you are interested - join them, if you succeed in this field, but you do not want to discuss it publicly? - Go to a private place. The result of such a group is also clearly visible.
One of the reasons that the newcomers are getting "shallower" compared to what they used to be is the general phobia of the new generation that everyone wants to steal everything from them. So they keep silent or create secret groups. I don't know what they're whispering about. But, judging by new orders in the service, everything comes down to a combination of standard indicators, martin and grids. And zero zest...
Here we go...
It's not so much software engineers as theorists...
physicists and mathematicians.
Judging by the tropicaster's post - yes
judging by the author's idea and his answers above, what he's looking for
the idea is that he's looking for a "closed" group in which he can discuss his own, and more importantly other people's ideas ...
--
So they should go to forum four. In the Automaton thread about the market being a controlled dynamic system. That's where they'll get their "hobby club". That's where Yusuf hangs out with his (18). That'll give them something to talk about. Maybe they'll build another mega-collider in 1:1 drawings
Well, brainstorming is still a method.
Until he has built up an army of brains to storm the don't-know-what, there will be nothing to storm. In order to get someone interested, you have to show them what they are interested in.
Otherwise, it's like, "Let's form an interest group. Anyone interested, please contact me in person."
Interested in what? Theme to create an interesting topic on the subject of general interest in the first place and did not think. Just a trivial, vague, generalised proposal.
Judging from the tropicaster's post, yes.
Based on the author's idea and his response above of what he's looking for
he's looking for a "CLOSED" group in which he can discuss his own, and more importantly other people's ideas ...
--
is this phobia bad or unfounded? I see no one doing anything for free in the market or in work... So here... people try not to give (if they do not want to) the fruits of their labors to others for free
Judging by the offer, he's the king. Recruits villeins under the auspices of common interests. Somehow...
It's not so much him that's being discussed, but the idea itself...
the suggestion is flawed... but it's not a bad idea...
which is better, or rather more useful and productive... ...is it better to have 10 adequate mathematician-programmers or 1000 trolls and "+100500"?
one of the reasons for creating a closed group - as i see it - is to strictly moderate and not allow flooding and rudeness ...
yes, that's the petty reason - not the goal
---
If, for example, on this resource - those who wish to have closed groups are given moderating authority over their group
he can moderate there just fine
(
If the METAQUOTES create closed groups - one of the tricks is to appoint a moderator to the closed group
and the reason will be removed ---
)
But he writes - he is embarrassed that the metaquotes will peep! Here one can feel the real intentions!
The fear that someone BETWEEN the group will see the fruits of the discussions, suggests that the intention is to take an individual interest in the fruits of the group's work.
It's not so much him that's being discussed, but the idea itself...
the suggestion is flawed... but it's not a bad idea...
which is better, or rather more useful and productive... ...is it better to communicate with 10 adequate mathematician-programmers or 1000 trolls and "+100500"?
YOU ARE DRIPPING IN THE WRONG PLACE!!!
A closed group is a salvation in this regard!
( so Renat offered it ) but the author denies it - that is what is confusing.
yeah, that's the petty reason - not the goal
---
If, for example, on this resource - those who wish to have closed groups are given moderating authority over their group
he can moderate there just fine
(
If the METAQUOTS create a closed group - one of the tricks is to appoint a moderator of the closed group
and the reason will be eliminated ---
)
But he - he writes - he is afraid that the methaquots will peep! Here one can feel the real intentions!
The fear that someone BETWEEN the group will see the fruits of the discussions, suggests that the intention is to take an individual interest in the fruits of the group's work.
maybe he doesn't trust the methaquotes...
there was an opinion in the discussion that all the championships were created just to steal ideas ))))