Why have subscriptions been banned on the grounds of "too high a yield" ? - page 73

 
joo:

just say no. :)

refrain from answering follow-up questions.

He's not answering.

He asked.

I would ask too.

And Renat should clarify what he meant.

 
Mischek:
Driver's not a clown, but Dickfix is thrilled with your breakdown.

It's not a breakdown. You just have to call things by their own words.

But go on.

 
Contender:

He doesn't answer.

He asked.

I would ask too.

And Renat should clarify what he meant.

answering a question with a question is indecent.
 
Contender:

He doesn't answer.

He asked.

I would ask too.

And Renat should clarify what he meant.

Do you also believe in +100500% p.a. when working through a brokerage company?
 
joo:
It's unseemly to answer a question with a question.

No, how would an idiot know he is an idiot?

Consequently, if the driver is an idiot, he doesn't realise it. But Renat seems to realise it, but doesn't argue it.

 
sanyooooook:
Do you also believe in +100500% p.a. when you work through a brokerage company?
I don't even believe in Father Christmas, let alone in dickfix percentages.
 
I'd rather go to Humour, it's cozier there.)
 
Mischek:
I'd rather go to Humour, it's cozier there.)
Yeah, and not get banned ;)
 
Contender:
Yeah, and they won't get banned ;)
Well, I don't care about that.
 
Contender:

No, how would an idiot know he is an idiot?

Consequently, if the driver is an idiot, he doesn't realise it. But Renat seems to realise it, but doesn't argue for it.

I know that Volodya is not an idiot. That's enough to keep me reading an interesting thread no matter what he replies, instead of watching an unflattering brawl among those who are my friends by the way.