mt5/mt4? - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And the explanation once again fails miserably when you connect to one broker who has a history of well over a year, to another who has instruments on the fingers count, when you need calendar history, when synthetic, when...
And why do I need such purity?
All the same, I want to believe that this is a temporary solution, dictated by marketing.
It's easier to solve a problem in one place (broker) than to offer an unworkable solution for tens of thousands of users of that broker.
It's a stage already passed. Never will the bulk of users be able to find the story or upload it themselves.
So the only solution is to make the broker provide a normal minute history.
It is easier to solve a problem in one place (the broker) than to offer an unworkable solution to tens of thousands of users of that broker.
It's a stage already passed. Never will the bulk of users be able to find the story or upload it themselves.
So the solution is one - make the broker provide a normal minute history.
Well yes, it's easier. Forcing broker A to provide the history for an instrument which broker B has, deep and high quality... funny.
It's easier to find the terminal that allows to do it, and then to do the dirty work - how to connect it with MT5, and whether it is necessary. My thoughts out loud.
If MT5 is not only a trading platform but also an analytical one, kicking the broker is not the solution.
Well, yes, it is easier. Getting broker A to provide a story on an instrument that broker B has, deep and high quality... That's funny.
It's easier to find a terminal that allows to do it, and then do the dirty work - how to connect it with MT5, and whether it is necessary. Thoughts aloud.
If MT5 is a platform not only for trading but also for analysis, kicking a broker is not the solution.
In fact, it is the only solution that works.
In fact, this is the only solution that works.
And let's start with the MQs.
You need majors, metals and fuels to build one version of the dollar index.
Please add metals (copper, palladium, platinum) and fuels (oil, gas, fuel oil).
At one time the matter was postponed on MT4, because of the limited number of indicator buffers, while I cannot implement it on the arrays. (I have not made it on buffers myself, I altered someone else's one). The stimulus for the transition to MT5, in particular, was that theme with an advanced index. Now I have buffers, I am mentally matured, but I have no history.
I am not even talking about groups of shares.
I think as long as the exchanges certify MT5, it means that the platform is OK. Switching from Mt4 to Mt5 was not very difficult. You don't have to use OOP at all. Although many functions are conveniently implemented in MT5.
What I do not like about forex... No unified quotes, unified conditions etc. What do you think, with MT4 there are too much wrong brokerage companies, how many people they deceived and how many people treat Forex as a scam now? And all the credit goes to Metakvotts!
Besides the order system is already like a standard in the Forex industry. Although the true standard is positions ...
Metakvottses are like Microsoft - everyone says bad things, but everyone uses them!
This begs the question, since they have become leaders and trendsetters, do not teach the children bad things! Who has traded on MT5 in Lightforex, he knows... the same problems as MT4/ Quotes are incomprehensible, delays in execution, autodealer, etc... Shame on them! Shame on you!!!!
On the other hand I am testing broker Otkrytie on RTS index. I think if Metakvotts specialists had set everything up turnkey, there wouldn't be the kind of quirks I'm seeing now... It all looks so unprofessional.
At Alphabank (or Fibo, I don't remember anymore) the commission is accumulated and deducted once a day. In the column "commission" - 0.0. Well is not it nonsense! That's why normal brokers do not rush with MT5. They say it is raw and so on.
Give me a product that would initially allow brokers to push the button and everything works and everyone would be happy !
In fact, this is the only solution that works.
In fact, at one time it should have been possible to organize the work of independent suppliers (providers) of quotes. This would have relieved both MQ and brokers and created another branch of profitable business.
"independent quotation providers..." Yeah, who's got the best quotations here? Come on in)) - pure scam...
they are more like comparing moon phases from different locations on earth, (Japan shouts crescent moon, Australia shouts partial moon and Canada shouts full moon - whichever one you like best)
Until a centralised quotation regulator is set up, the pipelines will continue to be tricked.
"independent quotation providers..." Yeah, who's got the best quotations? Come on in)) - pure scam...
it's more like comparing moon phases from different locations on earth, (Japan shouts crescent moon, australia shouts partial moon and canada shouts full moon - whichever you prefer)
as long as there is no centralized price regulator, the pipelines will continue to be tricked.
,,it's more like comparing the phase of the moon from different places on earth, (in Japan they shout crescent, in Australia only a part and in Canada already full - whichever one you like)
Have you heard anything about quotes on stock exchanges?
All kinds of quotes go to specialised information systems: Reuters, Bloomberg, Tenfor, DBC.
From there the information systems go out to the whole world - to the customers of the information systems: banks, private individuals, companies, anyone connected to the systems.
,,,+2 parts of "Trading House" from old man Beale.
и...............................
Wex
You were just talking about "old yellow shoes with black laces and worn heels.