Who has already tried the Signals subscription to get on the tail of ATC 2012 participants? - page 35
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What about 4 and 5 digits?
I'd rather have two at once. No need to be petty.
The important question about broker compatibility has been asked.
Before subscribing, in the next (not today's) build we will:
- compare the characteristics of the provider broker and the subscriber on several important parameters
- show comparison results and summary for user
- If the results are bad, you will not be able to subscribe.
Under unfavourable conditions you should never give subscribers from the start. Don't be taken again to mean "you decide for the user". Yes, we do decide, to guard against outright errors, and with the justification and detailed check points shown.
The verification will be done before the subscription fee is withdrawn, won't it...?
In response to numerous requests from local cutthroats who will start screaming that they are being denied the choice to get into the shit, the developers will add a functionality to the service whereby the subscriber can choose between: "if the check is successful, there will be a subscription" and "chase the money up front and get the check when the subscription expires". And since cutthroats won't stop there and will start screaming that validation prevents them from getting into the shit, as some of the shittiest providers get left out, the developers will add an additional feature: "Get into the shit without validation".
In response to numerous requests from local cutthroats who will start screaming that they are being denied the choice to get into the shit, the developers will add a functionality to the service whereby the subscriber can choose between: "if the check is successful, there will be a subscription" and "chase the money up front and get the check when the subscription expires". And since cutthroats won't stop there and will start screaming that verification prevents them from getting into the shit, as some of the shittiest providers get left out, the developers will add an additional feature: "Get into the shit without verification".
If a subscriber misses a profitable position, they will be in the red. If he misses a losing position he is in the plus.
If he doesn't understand or doesn't know or doesn't care, he misses nothing and the result is just like the provider....
He decides! (He has the right: money - property....)
Mixing signals and selective subscription is technically possible and not even difficult to do (given that the functionality is almost ready).
But what about paying for such a service? The question is not simple. And as long as there is no harmonious (and flawless) payment scheme, propaganda "for the Soviets" is useless.
--
As for financial security of investors, it is no less with mix and match subscription scheme (although not more). In addition, no one forces investors to use the multiple and selective subscription. But the attractiveness of such services is higher by orders of magnitude, it is a fact.
Such a scheme could really compete with PAMM.
Nowadays most smart PAMM investors diversify their risks by spreading their investments in several PAMMs.
1) have less to worry about (accounts, contracts, bodywork, etc.)
2) much better control of their finances.
This is unusually attractive.
By the way - it's not clear, well known similar services took as payment for such services, a piece - a multiple of the working lot of the signal buyer. We get a purely technical copeck, such as buying a signal for $ 1 - for a week. I think this is dumping or progress?
And all problems are solved....
As they say in our office when a person gives a prediction on some pair...
- Vote your opinion with your money! Open a position on your prediction!
That is the highest criterion of opinion! Let people manage their own money, make their own decisions..... the task of the service is to give a full range of options.... from my point of view....
.... And then it is possible to lay out the statistics of the most successful investment strategies through the service, statistics of the sequence of actions, etc. etc.
It is clear that people with serious money are not going to rush headlong into pushing buttons, they will first look at what and how, and the more data and the clearer the sequence required, the more money the service will attract.... now, what's the point of guessing with coffee.... just opinions not backed up by anything....
It makes sense to add points to the broadcast about the average weekly and monthly deposit growth - if you pay by the week and month...
And for the future, it makes sense to introduce statistics of average quarterly and annual growth (for serious investors) ...