Failure to fulfil their obligations and refusal to pay back the money - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
An excellent and sensible answer. But the answer is from the developer's point of view. So the question is: if you, as the developer, are not happy with the client's"abnormal and unreadable" assignment, what should you do: reject the"abnormal and unreadable", or take the"abnormal and unreadable" job?
In most cases, you can take it on and get it right, except in a few isolated cases. It is because of these isolated cases, now if it is clear from the assignment that the client has not paid enough attention to the preparation of the assignment, then unequivocally not.
You can easily find this article on komposter' s profile on the "four" (I can't go to the "four" forum right now to give you the link).
For now, the most sensible solution is simply to work through the service. There is no way to force it. Let things be as they are.
The current situation, as I understand it, has been resolved. The parties have agreed to finish the work through the service.
How to write an advisor and get the results you want
In most cases, you can take on a job and get it done, except in isolated cases. Because of these isolated cases, now if it is clear from the assignment that the client has not paid enough attention to the preparation of the assignment, then definitely not.
Let it be as it is.
At least a warning about the extreme undesirability of working 'not through the service'...
Even to the extent of saying that "working through a non-service means losing your money, regardless of the status of your chosen contractor". That's more understandable than any article.
Sorry for the offtops, but I couldn't take it.
wow! how many years on the internet, moderated on several resources myself - when I was not lazy, but to be a moderator and not be able to enter a forum, and for such a reason....
wow! no words! :)
Agree that with this approach, ALL the risks of working with"abnormal and unreadable" terms of reference are assumed by the developer. And the customer has the right to demand that the work is done as described in the TOR.
Not really, i.e. only some isolated cases are considered that way, in other cases the customer is sympathetic, at least with a kind word, if not with money.
Sorry for the offtops, but I couldn't take it.
wow! how many years on the internet, moderated on several resources myself - when I was not too lazy, but to be a moderator and not be able to enter a forum, and for such a reason....
wow! no words! :)
Not really, i.e. only some isolated cases are considered that way, in other cases the customer is sympathetic, at least with a kind word, if not with money.