Interesting and Humour - page 3061

 
Anatoli Kazharski:
Let me put it another way. Do you see a fig when you look in your book? )

No.

Only the pen on the cover has a cat on it - does that count?

 
Дмитрий:

))) And you got it wrong - the textbook was promised by Yuri!

Oh, come on...

:-) oh !!! like !!! Do you like it !!!?

where did i promise a tutorial?

And in 5 years they will say that I promised at the MQL forum to burn Moscow!

that's how history shuffles :-)))

and we don't even have the bits on the forum's hard drive yet

 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

To question ... Pushkin's poems. Moscow burned by fire given to the French - well, of course it's not a historical document.

This is the 2nd time I've said Pushkin never wrote that.
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

....

You didn't learn history at school, daddy...

...

 
All the moves are written down - come on, don't wiggle around!
 
Дмитрий:

No.

Only the pen on the cover has a cat on it - does that count?

Count if it counts. )
 
Anatoli Kazharski:
Count if it counts. )

Thank you, Father!

Can I count, then?

I like to correspond with you - you won't write anything good, but you'll kill a lot of time.

 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

... Pushkin's poems. Moscow burned by fire is given to the French

"Borodino" by M. Lermontov

"Tell me, Uncle, is it not in vain
Moscow, burned by fire,

Given to the French?

http://feb-web.ru/feb/lermont/texts/lerm06/vol02/le2-0802.htm

 
Дмитрий:

Thank you, Father!

Can I count, then?

I like to correspond with you - you won't write anything good, but you'll kill a lot of time.

I see you've written so much "good stuff" here, you can't unravel it yourself. Write some more. You may. )
 
Дмитрий:

That it doesn't say that Moscow was burned down by Kutuzov.

And it also says "Borka the Fool" with a pen on the side.

Dmitry!!! Oh my God!

Of course not Kutuzov!

That's not the way to understand it.

He left Moscow... ...Moscow burned!!!

So he surrendered Moscow and burned it!!!

It's allegorical.

but saving Russia is no longer allegorical.

The strategy was right - clever wise - there was another option - destruction.

or is it still not clear?