Interesting and Humour - page 261
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Where did you find this nonsense?
OK, I understand that the number of bars of metal per capita is more or less an objective parameter. But how did they calculate IQ...
P.S. Oh, I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AverageIQ-Map-World.png:
Oh, wow. All of America is dumber than Russia and even more so than China. And the dumbest are Australians. But there's another version:
This is closer to the "racially correct" version, as it should be...
If they took the south coast, it'd be like us, but the Bushmen dilute it.
but why is China in the lead?
No, it's a shame.
I've seen the Chinese and the Japanese. Day and night. A Japanese guy walks into a room and the whole history of Japan goes into it, and words cannot express it.
You'll think 10 times before you ask, and the translator was wrong. The interpreter is good, but not a technician. He blushed. The Japs had a lot of patience in their behaviour. I respected them.
And the Chinese...
I'd rather not say anything politically correct.
Australia is quite clear, if they had taken the south coast, it would have been like us, but the Bushmen are very diluted.
but why is China in the lead?
At the bottom, in blue shades, the most intelligent are China, Japan, the USA, Australia and most of the Western European countries.
Africans, Arabs and Indians are pretty stupid.
It's really weird.
And the Chinese, they're geniuses at copying. That is the beginning and the basis of intelligence.
But you can't see Israel there at all...
And the Chinese - they are genius at copying. That is the beginning and the basis of intelligence.
The Japanese did the same thing in the beginning. We just forgot. And now it's a technological powerhouse. True, they still lag behind the US in science...
By the way, I don't remember the figures, but roughly 90% of the population in Japan live on 10% of the territory.
That's when Japan's population is around 125 million
and the population of Finland is roughly like St. Petersburg about 5 million
By the way, I don't remember the figures, but roughly 90% of the population in Japan live on 10% of the territory.
In Russia too, it is similar, although not as uneven. The density of people in the Asian part of the country is maybe 1-2 people per square kilometre.
And it's the same in China.
And in Russia it is the same, though not so perverted. And it is the same in China.
You can't compare it with Russia. In Japan, you can't live on 90% of the land because of the terrain. With us you just live. Live and develop, develop and live. Well the far north can be excluded from the favorable areas.
But this does not change the picture in principle.
If you exclude 30 per cent of territory (perhaps 5 million square kilometres), then, yes, there will be no far north left. But that's more than the territory of Europe!
What to do with this territory?! Who's going to develop it? You think the Chinese will go there?
I understand that it's hard for them in China. But they'll die out with such frosts...
If you cut out 30 per cent of territory (perhaps 5 million square kilometres), then, yes, there would be no Extreme North. But it is more than the territory of Europe!
What to do with this territory?! Who's going to develop it? Do you think the Chinese will go there?
I understand that it's hard for them in China. But they'll die out with such frosts...