Interesting and Humour - page 3055

 
Vladimir Suschenko:
I'll tell you what to do - first, learn how to communicate.
It is not working! You're still using foul language on the forum (despite remarks) while accusing Shnur of something
 

Shnurov had a dream that Moscow was on fire, a dream with many details. And they're trying to sell us that it's not just for fun, that it's a reflection of the movement in society... and see many more noble impulses in Shnurov and other Shnurovs...

Could Shnurov have a dream that he, Shnurov, is sitting in paradise and these paradises are in Moscow?

Not a chance.

And not because there is no paradise in Moscow, but because Shnurov's audience will not give a penny for such a song. And the audience Shnurov's breed purposefully - selection, then the audience begins to think on a theme "Shnurov wants that my house has burned down, and maybe in the butt... "for the rest of his life. But Shnurov is not like that, he has a new generation of young morons in the amount of 60 million, and the main thing in it all BABLO, BABLO ... There are no social problems here, there is NOTHING, and Shnurov only reflects his irrepressible desire to dough at any price, dough doesn't smell, and when it's in his own pocket, it's just goodNESS.

 
Good song!
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

ehhh ... wanted a market once ? - they did ... Well, that's what we got ... the collapse into feudal principalities with all that implies ... and instead of a market , a bazaar with swearing ...

everything is possible - the inner barriers and stopcocks are down ...

Who wanted to? When did they want it? And the question is, what did they want? Although that last one is no longer the question. ) And everything that follows explains it quite well.
 

СанСаныч Фоменко:

And Shnurov only reflects his irrepressible desire for dough at any cost, dough doesn't smell, and when it's in his own pocket, it's just about benevolence.

Well, okay, Shnur is bad. The question is, how are the others any better? What follows is a long list of popular performers:..... Actually, at least Shnur "reflects" something and somehow. The others are nothing at all.

With very few exceptions.

 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

yeah right - the analogy is inappropriate

--

the publicity itself is really off the charts ...

there's just no propaganda here - there's just over 60 million people willing to listen

there's no need for propaganda

and the only ones who fail to grasp the phenomenon are the deaf and blind or the "ostrich" .... shyly sticking their head in the sand - they may as well remain silent

the question is where the desire to listen comes from - where and what's the point?

or 26 years of "market" mate from the stage has become so widespread that one can feed the "crowd" with anything ...

in 26 years? chanson with mats had been sung long before that... everyone is discussing Shnur, but how is blatnyak better?
 
СанСаныч Фоменко:

Shnurov had a dream that Moscow was on fire, a dream with many details. And they're trying to sell us that it's not just for fun, that it's a reflection of the movement in society... and saw many more noble impulses in Shnurov and other Shnurovs...

Could Shnurov have a dream that he, Shnurov, is sitting in paradise and these paradises are in Moscow?

Not a chance.

And not because there is no paradise in Moscow, but because Shnurov's audience will not give a penny for such a song. And the audience Shnurov's breed purposefully - selection, then the audience begins to think on a theme "Shnurov wants that my house has burned down, and maybe in the butt... "for the rest of his life. But Shnurov is not like that, he has a new generation of young morons in the amount of 60 million, and the main thing in it all BABLO, BABLO ... There are no social problems here, there is NOTHING, and Shnurov only reflects his irrepressible desire to dough at any price, dough doesn't smell, and when it's in his own pocket, it's just bliss.

Because Shnur is sitting in paradise in St. Petersburg.
 
Maybe Schnur was reading Tolstoy's 'Kyss' before going to bed.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Well, okay, Schnur is bad. The question is, how are the others better? What follows is a long list of popular performers:..... Actually, at least Shnur "reflects" something and somehow. The others are nothing at all.

With very few exceptions.

Of course.

Shnurov refers to show business. I once heard Kobzon say: "A Soviet song was meant to be sung by people. And showbiz songs are for sale". Shnurov belongs to the garbage part of this show business.

One could spit.

But here is a specific discussed song in the brain thought "may this Moscow burn". But the song "Morning paints with a gentle light the walls of the ancient Kremlin" is not heard by Shnurov's audience at all. The audience of Shnurov is prepared to destroy Moscow, and the audience of May is prepared to defend Moscow.

 
Alexandr Saprykin:
in 26 years? chanson with foul language had been sung long before that... everyone is discussing Shnur, but how is blatnyak better?

I don't think he was in the mood of most people