Interesting and Humour - page 2815
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, it's all right.)
I wonder if it is real to stop the process, or is it over?)
Especially the deckhouse is a very good target.
It's better to hit it near the waterline - it'll sink faster.
Don't go to the bottom, it must be radioactive.
money for war is money for the past - they would rather spend money on the future....technology is of course the coolest, but only for self-destruction...what the fuck do they need it for?...they still hope to keep people in fear...with modern communications people have no fear of anything... not even death...which is too bad...order is still based on fear...
Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin, led by psychologist Carol Holaghan, have concluded that quitting drinking altogether is more dangerous than alcoholism. The study, published in the journalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, sums up two decades of work.
The study involved more than 1800 people aged 55 to 65 years, who were divided into three groups: alcoholics, moderate drinkers and teetotalers.
They found that people who abstain from alcohol die before others. On average, 69 per cent of them do not make it to their 65th birthday. The figure for alcoholics was 60 per cent, while the figure for moderate drinkers was just 41 per cent. This is despite the fact that drinking alcohol obviously increases the risk of illness and accidents.
There is no correlation with other factors. It does not matter how much you earn, how often you exercise or how many friends you have.
http://www.ridus.ru/news/194888.html
Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin, led by psychologist Carol Holaghan, have concluded that quitting drinking altogether is more dangerous than alcoholism. The study, published in the journalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, sums up two decades of work.
The study involved more than 1800 people aged 55 to 65 years, who were divided into three groups: alcoholics, moderate drinkers and teetotalers.
They found that people who abstain from alcohol die before others. On average, 69 per cent of them do not make it to their 65th birthday. The figure for alcoholics was 60 per cent, while the figure for moderate drinkers was just 41 per cent. This is despite the fact that drinking alcohol obviously increases the risk of illness and accidents.
There is no correlation with other factors. It does not matter how much you earn, how often you exercise or how many friends you have.
http://www.ridus.ru/news/194888.html
Well, modern "science" is a corrupt whore. And the modern "scientist" is a walking prostitute. An academic is a pimp. Everything from the diploma to the "academic" degree is for sale, as well as the results of "scientific" research. If some distillery owner comes to a university and finances "scientific research", the result will be known to be like the above. And if a soft drink factory owner comes to the same university and also pays for "scientific research", the "scientific" results and their "conclusions" will be the opposite of the previous ones.
Rectors of universities, as well as "pseudoscience" committees, are careful to ensure that the clients' TOR are strictly adhered to, for which they receive their share of orders. If any scientist inadvertently obtains scientific results which do not comply with the TOR, he will be immediately declared a freak, a representative of "pseudoscience" and suspended from "scientific" activities.