Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2909
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The question is probably not for me, as I don't see any problems with replenishment.
I am interested in the future.
It is reckless to plan something on Forex. We all know here that we work with about 50/50 probability.
I was thinking of helping with mytarmailS access on my account. The probability of a drain is high, so it's almost a sure way to make money.
That's reality - no offence intended.
I was thinking of helping with mytarmailS access on my account. The likelihood of a drain is high, so it's almost a sure way to make money.
That's reality - no offence.
I was thinking of helping with mytarmailS access on my account. The likelihood of a drain is high, so it's almost a sure way to make money.
This is reality - no offence taken.
That's very strange logic
Alexey, I need forex, not forts.
Yes there is Forex - the signal in the profile is tormented :)
very strange logic
If a person is going to lose anyway, maybe a cent account is enough for him? :) That's why I was asking about trading plans.....
Yes there is Forex - the signal in the profile is tormented :)
Well then we can communicate, write
Well, then we can chat, write
So I'm asking - do you want to experiment or have you decided that it's time to become a millionaire?
Second of course
It's a private message.
Reading about the renaissance and Simons who has learnt the market. Quote
It's not hard to see that in real trading.
for example, right now you piss on the whole cutlet and the price instantly turns against the open order and continues until you settle down.
You settle down, what's left is what's left.
If you don't settle down, you lose everything.
There's no need to think and invent anything else, it's as simple as an egg.
So you can't identify a regularity on the basis of history, it's a dabble and attempts to summarise, leading to absolutely no result.