PrizmaL Pro

bad one

I have been using Prismal Pro for 2 months now. I have gone from 100k account to 95k account. It has exited serval times right as the market starts to turn around. This is the not the product you are promised and will be a waste of your money. I have account trades and screenshots to prove it. I sent them to the seller...no response....stay away...you have been warned. My broker was IC Markets and I also tried it on a prop firm, both failed.

I already use Prizmal Pro since 3 weeks. The result is around 10% per month. I am very happy with the support. Good work Vladimir

I recently deactivated the Primal Professional EA and am no longer an active user due to significant dissatisfaction with the product. Despite adhering to the author's settings and using recommended setfiles on IC Markets, my accounts have suffered losses of 4% and 9% respectively, even with the risk setting moderately adjusted to level 4 out of 8. This has highlighted severe issues with the EA's risk management and its Drawdown (DD) control, which did not align with the optimistic portrayals suggested by the backtests. The backtesting results, did not reflect the performance seen on live accounts, leading to serious doubts about the EA's reliability and advertised effectiveness. Additionally, there is a confusing mismatch as the author uses a broker that only supports MT4 for his signals, whereas the EA is designed for MT5, raising questions about compatibility and performance that have not been transparently addressed. Moreover, the marketing practices surrounding this EA are troubling. The fluctuating claims of exclusivity and pricing inconsistencies are indicative of a lack of transparency and raise concerns about the sincerity of the marketing efforts. Due to these overwhelmingly negative experiences and the substantial discrepancies between promised and actual performance, I was compelled to deactivate the EA yesterday to prevent further losses. Given these points, I cannot recommend the Primal Professional EA. Prospective buyers should be cautious of the significant differences between the promoted outcomes and the real-world performance, as well as the inconsistent and misleading marketing tactics used by the author. My experience suggests a disregard for user satisfaction and fiscal responsibility.

There are some points that are not credible. (1) EA has suffered two recent losses. All the small daily gains are gone and the account balance is decreasing. The author will give excuses such as wrong settings. prospective buyers should know that it does not work according to SIGNAL. (2)The marketing methods are terrible, as several people have already mentioned: they lie about being limited to 100 people, the price goes up and down, and they are inconsistent. Anyone can see that existing users will be dissatisfied. But how much can you trust an author's EA that doesn't care about existing users and has inconsistent marketing?

So far so good. The chart can quickly get quite bloated with trades, and what is happening is not always easy to understand. But it works, it is profitable and live trading is pretty much the same as backtesting. My paranoid self thinks an EA is as good as how it handles drawdown. Well I had one hard stop of every running trades. It did not look too glorious. But at least, I know what happens when the system fails. And it's not that bad. And it's a rare thing, according to backtests. This could be a very good EA.

And please... people... stop whining about the price of the EA. That is just noise.

The EA has a 5% loss at the end of March and beginning of April, respect to the author, the person who provides support, but he deceives with his marketing by saying that he will not lower the price and all that remains is to give it away.

Initially, I encountered challenges with my EA which affected my workflow. However, upon reaching out to Mr. Vladimir via direct message, I was promptly and thoroughly assisted with great enthusiasm. I am extremely pleased with the level of support provided.

The ea is not good, I believe the signal is manipulated and the author is a scammer

Posted the ea at 1599 initially Saying 100 purchase only and then no more sale of the early Now price is dropped to 499

Fantastic Expert Advisor! It's been a game-changer for me. With high success rates and the author's speedy responses, it's been a pleasure to use. I've tried it on low to medium risk level 3, and the results have been incredibly smooth and profitable. Kudos on such a reliable tool! Thanks a million Vladimir !!

This EA is reliable because it has been running Live Signal for over a year and has been demonstrating its performance.

I'm confident that if we operate at a medium to low risk without being greedy, we can increase our capital in the long term and I'm running a real account with the same settings as Live Signal.

We just need to give EA the right risk setting and time. Lastly, I would like to thank Vladimir for his kind and quick support.

I have used this EA now for a few weeks. Its been profitable upto risk level 3. At level 4, the drawdown gets too scary for me so I backtrack to risk level 3 where though profitable, not the levels advertised. For thos that got the same results as advertised, please let me know your exact parameters. I don't think the EA is bad. I never lost a day on risk levels 1, 2, 3. But I need to know how I can improve my returns

Overall positive results so far using this EA. Backtest was positive when testing past history using the selected strategies, now been running on live account and is also profitable overall. A good and reliable EA so far.

Positive Feedback !

I don't think this product is good and I don't understand the 5 star reviews. Trading is bad at brokers 1)icmarket, 2)roboforex, 3)zeromarket. 1) Even though the strategy is optimized, stop loss occurs, and there are many duplicate transactions even if the transaction delay time is set to 5000ms. 1) Trading against the trend 2) Since it is overlapping trading, your account will be ruined if there is a strong bull or bear market. Additionally, trading is very different from open signals.

For this reason, I stopped using the product.

First of all, this is one of the very best EAs you can buy right now. @TheBraveOcelot is spot on so I won't repeat their words.

.

Secondly, Vladimir is probably going to be disappointed that I only used his very low risk recommendations for a day. Then I amped it up to 10 lots and all strategies enabled simultaneously and on multiple accounts :)

.

I haven't needed support aside from the first "please send me recommended set files" but Vladimir is very responsive and very friendly. I understand the concerns of a couple of others on here regarding the pricing and sales strategy. Most sellers have "only 10 more copies at $999 before it goes to $1999". I suspect Vladimir is just a little less practiced at the seller game than many of the others. It paid for itself on about day 2, so doesn't really matter :)

.

https:// imgur . com/a/6JL0ZKz

Great and stable expert advisor, good support from Vladimir

been very consistent from day one. will make you .5 to 1% only thing that is very weird is the author is not consistent with price or his word. Started at 1800 now at 500? 100 copies sold to unlimited copies? Somethings not right

Please carefully understand the characteristics of this amazing EA. When you understand it, you will not need any other EA, it is that excellent! Thanks, Vladimir!

Up to date, the EA is yielding the results described by the author. Good attention from them.