- Equity
- Drawdown
Distribution
Symbol | Deals | Sell | Buy | |
---|---|---|---|---|
EURUSD | 253 | |||
GBPUSD | 129 | |||
GBPCHF | 23 | |||
XAUUSD | 6 | |||
AUDUSD | 1 | |||
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
|
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
|
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
|
Symbol | Gross Profit, USD | Loss, USD | Profit, USD | |
---|---|---|---|---|
EURUSD | 292 | |||
GBPUSD | 254 | |||
GBPCHF | -251 | |||
XAUUSD | 24 | |||
AUDUSD | 0 | |||
200
400
600
800
1K
|
200
400
600
800
1K
|
200
400
600
800
1K
|
Symbol | Gross Profit, pips | Loss, pips | Profit, pips | |
---|---|---|---|---|
EURUSD | 8.8K | |||
GBPUSD | 7.3K | |||
GBPCHF | -5.4K | |||
XAUUSD | 790 | |||
AUDUSD | 16 | |||
2.5K
5K
7.5K
10K
13K
15K
18K
20K
23K
25K
28K
30K
|
2.5K
5K
7.5K
10K
13K
15K
18K
20K
23K
25K
28K
30K
|
2.5K
5K
7.5K
10K
13K
15K
18K
20K
23K
25K
28K
30K
|
- Deposit load
- Drawdown
The average slippage based on execution statistics on real accounts of various brokers is specified in pips. It depends on the difference between the provider's quotes from "KeytoMarkets-Server" and the subscriber's quotes, as well as on order execution delays. Lower values mean better quality of copying.
VantageInternational-Live
|
0.00 × 2 | |
ICMarketsEU-MT5-4
|
0.08 × 26 | |
ICMarketsSC-MT5-2
|
0.21 × 1369 | |
ICMarketsSC-MT5
|
0.22 × 1937 | |
BlackBullMarkets-Live
|
0.83 × 1428 | |
Pepperstone-MT5-Live01
|
0.86 × 711 | |
ICMarketsSC-MT5-4
|
0.89 × 3360 | |
RoboForex-ECN
|
1.07 × 828 | |
FusionMarkets-Live
|
2.59 × 469 | |
Exness-MT5Real5
|
3.26 × 614 | |
xChief-MT5
|
4.51 × 532 | |
GBEbrokers-LIVE
|
5.50 × 2 | |
XMGlobal-MT5 2
|
5.55 × 516 | |
ActivTradesCorp-Server
|
6.00 × 6 | |
RoboForex-Pro
|
7.92 × 351 | |
Weltrade-Real
|
9.22 × 413 | |
Swissquote-Server
|
9.60 × 5 | |
I removed the "TEST" from the name. I think that this strategy is good to copy, but how I write in the description, only to divide the risk with another signal. Not use as primary signal.
At the beginning of the month, we resume the Silent Hill case study. Why case study? Because I have brought this "non-signal" to the channel since the beginning, when it was still in the testing phase. I remember with technical, but not financial, interest, when not even published, after backtests etc. etc., it immediately took a blunder that skipped all the cases contemplated so far which led to the triggering of the critical stop (by critical stop I mean that CURRENCY stop which I now include on all my EAs calculated on the risk foreseen in the first instance, and then realized after months of real existence). Result after 3 days: - 35% if I'm not mistaken. Well, version after version, correction after analysis, we have almost returned to the original budget (100 euros) and this is already good. In the month of June it achieved a 7-8% recovery (how would it change if I instead said 7-8 euros of profit) with a DD always contained (less than 8%)
Today in my channel I text some interesting update and result about the 2 versions that I'm testing. Come to my channel telegram --> tnt_info
Small and large updates on Silent Hill. After the unfortunate start, with a situation that has never happened in 4 months of testing (but that's what real tests are for) today I have two setups to try. On the account viewable on MQL5, a small update with a percentage stop on the starting price, to remove excessive risks (if it has to be stopped, it is worth doing it in the right time and saving money). On another account instead a version with an enhanced grill. Let's see who performs better!