Silent Hill

I removed the "TEST" from the name. I think that this strategy is good to copy, but how I write in the description, only to divide the risk with another signal. Not use as primary signal.

At the beginning of the month, we resume the Silent Hill case study. Why case study? Because I have brought this "non-signal" to the channel since the beginning, when it was still in the testing phase. I remember with technical, but not financial, interest, when not even published, after backtests etc. etc., it immediately took a blunder that skipped all the cases contemplated so far which led to the triggering of the critical stop (by critical stop I mean that CURRENCY stop which I now include on all my EAs calculated on the risk foreseen in the first instance, and then realized after months of real existence). Result after 3 days: - 35% if I'm not mistaken. Well, version after version, correction after analysis, we have almost returned to the original budget (100 euros) and this is already good. In the month of June it achieved a 7-8% recovery (how would it change if I instead said 7-8 euros of profit) with a DD always contained (less than 8%)

Today in my channel I text some interesting update and result about the 2 versions that I'm testing. Come to my channel telegram --> tnt_info

Small and large updates on Silent Hill. After the unfortunate start, with a situation that has never happened in 4 months of testing (but that's what real tests are for) today I have two setups to try. On the account viewable on MQL5, a small update with a percentage stop on the starting price, to remove excessive risks (if it has to be stopped, it is worth doing it in the right time and saving money). On another account instead a version with an enhanced grill. Let's see who performs better!