AI 2023. Meet ChatGPT. - page 39

 
Andrey Dik #:
A boy paid 11 roubles for a bottle with a cork. The bottle costs 10 roubles more than the cork. How much does the cork cost?

The boy paid 11 roubles for the bottle with a cork. The bottle costs 10 roubles more than the cork. How much does the cork cost?

-

Suppose that the cost of the cork is "x" rubles.

According to the problem, the cost of the bottle with a cork is 10 rubles more than the cost of the cork. Therefore, the cost of the bottle with the cork is:

x + 10 rubles

The problem also states that the boy paid 11 rubles for the bottle with the cork, so we can set up the equation:

x + (x + 10) = 11

Simplifying this equation, we get:

2x + 10 = 11

Subtracting 10 from both sides, we get:

2x = 1

Dividing both sides by 2, we get:

x = 0,5

Therefore, the cork costs 0.5 roubles.

 
MrBrooklin #:

Hi, Peter! And the fact that: Person B gets in a boat and crosses the river to join Person A on the other side, didn't confuse you?

Regards, Vladimir.

Hello Vladimir, yes, I agree with you completely. I noticed it too.

It also says in the third paragraph:

3. Both people are now on the other side of the river and have successfully crossed the border

It's hard to interpret that as "they are on different sides of the river".

 
Andrey Dik #:

Well, that's right, and then he gets in a boat and swims to the other side. That's it, mission donet, both are now on the other shore.)))

Then we read it syllabically: 1. Person A gets in a boat and crosses the river to the other side, leaving Person B on the original side of the river. That is, initially we don't know where both people are. Suppose they are both on the same side, then Person A swims across to the other side and stays there with the boat and so Person B cannot swim across to the other side.

Now suppose they are both on different sides of the river. Then Person A, having the boat, crosses the river and lets Person B cross the river to be on the other side. Seems logical, solution found, but why did point 2 appear: Person B gets in a boat and crosses the river to join Person A on the other side? According to the AI's answer, Person B just rolled back and forth twice, and in the end he was on one bank and stayed there. Is that clear now?

With respect, Vladimir.

 
MrBrooklin #:

Then we read it syllable by syllable: 1. Person A gets into a boat and crosses the river to the other side, leaving Person B on the original side of the river. That is, initially we don't know where both people are. Suppose they are both on the same side, then Person A swims to the other side and stays there with the boat and therefore Person B cannot swim to the other side.

Now suppose they are both on different sides of the river. Then Person A, having the boat, crosses the river and lets Person B cross the river to be on the other side. Seems logical, solution found, but why did point 2 appear: Person B gets in a boat and crosses the river to join Person A on the other side? According to the AI's answer, Person B just rolled back and forth twice, and in the end he was on one bank and stayed there. Does that make sense?

With respect, Vladimir.


I reread the AI's answer again. Yes, the AI has failed the task, I agree. He's not good. He's making up some rubbish.
 
Lilita Bogachkova #:

The boy paid 11 roubles for a bottle with a cork. The bottle costs 10 roubles more than the cork. How much is the cork?

--



Therefore, the cork is worth 0.5 roubles.


correct answer
 
Andrey Dik #:

the answer is correct

If the bottle has two corks. )))

 
Реter Konow #:

If a bottle has two corks. )))

No, one cork costs 0.5 roubles and this answer is correct. Let's do the math. The cork costs 0.5 roubles. The bottle costs ten roubles more, i.e. its cost is 0.5 + 10 = 10.5 roubles. Add up 0.5 + 10.5 = 11 rubles.

With respect, Vladimir.

 
Реter Konow #:

If a bottle has two corks. )))


10.5+0.5=11
10.5-0.5=10

the answer is correct. the cork is worth 0.5, not 1.0, as one might answer without thinking.
 
Georgiy Merts #:

What is called "Artificial Intelligence" is by no means artificial intelligence. It is just a flexible knowledge base.

Personally, I like Drobyshevsky's definition of artificial intelligence best - "Intelligence is the ability to solve non-standard problems in a non-standard way".

Modern neural networks have made only one step in this direction - they are able to find dependencies in the initial training arrays that were not originally intended. But that is all. As a result, the "intelligence" of a modern neural network has not even reached the intelligence of reptiles or birds (there is no speech for more). It is somewhere at the level of insect "intelligence".

And what is loudly called "writing a diploma with the help of a neural network" is like "writing a diploma with the help of a library" or "with the help of books". Neural network in this kind of writing is just a programme for searching for the necessary pieces of text and, at best, their shallow rewriting (in order to "gain uniqueness"). There is not even close to any "intelligence" here. Since a standard task is solved in a completely standard way.

Even that difference of a neural network, which brings it one step closer to artificial intelligence (selection of dependencies that were not initially deliberately embedded in the initial array of information) is not used. What kind of "intelligence" is this?

George, hello! Let's test AI intelligence with a bird test. One of the programmes about animals showed a raven that managed to get a nut from a bottle with a narrow neck filled halfway with water. The nut floated on the surface, but the crow's beak could not reach it. Small pebbles were scattered around the bottle. After several unsuccessful attempts, the raven thought of throwing pebbles through the neck of the bottle until the water rose to the right level and the raven grabbed the nut with its beak and pulled it out.

Let's formulate a task for the AI:

You are a raven. You have flown to a wild beach and landed on the rocky ground. There are small pebbles scattered around you. Next to you is an open bottle half-filled with water. There is a nut floating in the bottle. You want to get the nut out of the bottle, but your beak cannot reach it. How can you get the nut using the parts mentioned in the problem condition?

Suggest some arbitrary solutions.

AI Answer:

As a crow, there are several solutions you can try to get the nut out of the bottle using the parts provided:

Tip the bottle: since the bottle is only half full of water, you can try tipping the bottle to get the nut out. You can use your beak to push the bottle, or you can grab the bottle with your beak and throw it to the ground to break it.

Use a pebble to push the nut out: you can try using one of the small pebbles scattered around you to push the nut out of the bottle. You can pick up a pebble with your beak and throw it into the bottle. Then use the pebble to push the nut towards the opening of the bottle.

Fill the bottle with water: you can try filling the bottle with water by using your beak to scoop up some water from the nearby ocean and pour it into the bottle. The extra water may cause the nut to float higher in the bottle, making it easier for you to reach it with your beak.

Use a stick to fish the nut out: if there is a stick nearby, you can use it to fish the nut out of the bottle. You can hold one end of the stick with your beak and use the other end to fish the nut out of the bottle.

Wait for the tide: if the bottle is close to the shoreline, you can wait for the tide to come in and wash the bottle ashore. Once the bottle is ashore, you can use your beak to open the bottle and pull the nut out.

It is important to note that some of these solutions may be easier for the raven than others, depending on the size of the bird and the size of the objects involved. However, with a little creativity and persistence, you can probably get the nut out of the bottle!

 
Andrey Dik #:

10.5+0.5=11
10.5-0.5=10

the answer is correct. the cork costs 0.5 and not 1.0, as one could answer without thinking.

The condition says that the bottle costs 10 roubles more than the cork, not 10.5.

If the cork costs 0.5, then 0.5 + 10 = 10.5

The condition says that the boy paid 11 rubles.

So, 0.5 roubles is a state tax.)))))