You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, how can it be "unrelated" if optimisation selects the level that is most adequate to price movements?
Or what do you mean?
In your sense, "optimisation" is tantamount to fitting the story...
Can't such simple things be understood?
In your mind "optimisation" is tantamount to fitting the story...
Don't you understand such simple things?
I don't. And what is "not fitting"? How else can you determine the level of the same TA or SL, than by looking at the history?
And don't get arrogant with me... We're all sort of colleagues here, after all...
Sergey, I am not against intelligent position management. But the topic of the thread raises a clear question, whether or not take-trade improves the strategy. My cautious answer is yes. The test is done on 20s, not 2s. Take a look at it.
My answer is that it improves for heavily flattened symbols. For symbols with frequent trends, it makes it worse.
Not clear. What is a "non-fit"? How else can you determine the level of the same TP or SL without looking at the history?
Non-adjustment is when test and optimization on one pair is quietly making profit on the other pair...
Have you heard such a thing...?
Noooo.
Thrall is not an option. It is the essence of accompaniment. A tralle cannot be an "option", because any system has one or the other. So how can you call something that is necessarily present in any system an "option"?
NOT FITTING is when testing and optimising on one pair calmly makes a profit on the other pair...
Have you heard of such a thing...?
Not only have I not heard it, but I don't believe it, especially about "quietly gives". Except for when pairs move almost identically. Can you give me an example of such strategies, with a demonstration of this very "quietly gives profit"? For me it is purely the Grail.
Sergey, I am not against intelligent position management. But the topic of the thread raises the clear question of whether or not taking a take trade improves the strategy. My cautious answer is yes. The test is done on 20s, not 2s. Take a look.
If the trading system provides for TP, then there are options for using it:
Well, as I said, they are significantly different systems. If the symbol is heavily flattened, a trawl will be better. If the symbol has large volatile movements, a trawl will be worse than a fixed one.