The future of the Forex industry - page 156
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Apparently, if one reads this entire thread, the way to the True Grail will be revealed to those who are suffering. There is no doubt about that.
However, when I start reading it, I realise that I don't understand a single word. That's a shame.
No time to explain! just put on a robe, grab a poker and devil a pentagram in a cocoon!
I have said many times that I am for space and for logos.
But we should not forget about Nus(Noos) with Fronesis. For any meaningful thought/word is born of the mind (nous) and implemented by pragmatism (Fronesis).
In general, as they say Peace! Labour! May! Nous! Logos! Fronesis!
But we should not forget about Nus(Noos) with Fronesis. For any meaningful thought/word is born of the mind (nous) and is realised by pragmatism (Fronesis).
In general, as they say Peace! Labour! May! Nous! Logos! Fronesis!
class
class
I think the ancients kept it simple and straightforward - no thoughts-words hovering around in the middle of nowhere, arising for reasons you don't understand and from where)
Well torn... and whimpered resentfully...
Here's also a prime example of the victim trying to painfully replay the situation but wishing it in a hopelessly stupid way (by talking nonsense to the good drimmer) 😁
Of course he is - where will the skills come from a low skilled worker on the level of a cleaner (as he identified himself)
And obviously Ulad is wildly jealous and angry - if only by how strenuously he tries to deny it... 😁😂🤣
He can't get out of this trap and get rid of the shame.
The fact is that low-intellectual hairy hippy creatures in adidas will always lose to the intellectual elite.
Ulad, realise you can't get off topic and you'll forever be bombarded with envy of the highly cultured capitalist Drimmer 😀
Yeah I've seen some cultured ones around here.
♥!♥
I've seen some cultured ones around here.
♥!♥
You've been hanging out with all sorts of rabble and scum, okay...
I hope you've at least realized why you and the cleaners get paid low wages.
And they shouldn't pay much to people who don't have valuable skills...
I think everything with the ancients was simple and straightforward - no thoughts-words floating around in the middle of nowhere, arising in the middle of nowhere and arising from nowhere).
it always seemed to me that the idea of rigid stasis in eidos was something very artificial and highly simplified
You're posting again, aren't you?
Did you check the State Department under the bed? And in the wardrobe?
😁😂🤣
What a primitive character with binary politicised thinking!
Now would suspect the noble Drimmer of being a westernist...
I have said many times that I am for space and for logos.
Realise Mr Khorosh that you are just torn with envy and anger and have no real argument against Drimer.
Oh, and one more thing: poor socialists must suffer - such is the constant of history and geography.
"Here, too, is a prime example of the victim trying to painfully overplay the situation but wishing to do so in a hopelessly obtuse way (by talking nonsense about the good guy" Nice)
That's how I believed you. You call yourself a capitalist, and a capitalist won't do for free what others are paid to do).
It always seemed to me that the idea of rigid stasis in an eidos is something very artificial and highly simplified.
As far as I understand, Plato's unchangeable eidos was needed in order to combine the points of Heraclitus about the imperceptible and constant changeability of the material world with the points of Parmenides about the impossibility of knowledge of motion. On the other hand, nobody prevents anybody to invent his own approach, with any eidos) All the same, logical contradictions cannot be avoided).
As far as I understand, Plato's unchangeable eidos was necessary to combine the statements of Heraclitus about an imperceptable and constant changeability of the real world with those of Parmenides about impossibility of cognition of motion. Respectively, in his approach the changeable eidos is not necessary at all, because it does not give anything in the plan of cognition of being) On the other hand, nobody prevents anybody to invent his own approach, with any eidos) Anyway, logical contradictions cannot be avoided)
Some transition from immutable ideas to mutable forms is somehow necessary. In one of my visions I saw the One as such a fat fractal cactus, or so it seemed to me, the other time it was a fir-tree. And there the transition to specific forms was like a transition from trunk to branches and leaves. Of course it only seems so, because a real fractal has no tips, everything there is always smaller parts. And if the analogy is true, it means that nothing exists at all. Nothing is real at all. Hooray. We're all in Eidos now.