The NSP and the paradoxes of nature - page 37
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't cook anything, it's the author who cooks something great judging by his statements.
I don't use any kind of indices, the signals never work;-)
As for the choice you're right, with gauges you have the choice to trade a flat or a trend, but then again they don't have a choice, you can't know beforehand where the flat ends and where the trend starts, can you? )
if you look at the formula, it will be redrawn
i've already written somewhere that if you don't have a mathematical proof of the sample size, choosing either 4 or 20 price values, the calculation results are the opposite
which means there is a 50/50 chance of using an EOI prediction
Are you suggesting that you continue to give the newcomers crap?
What has life taught you anyway?
You've been seen many times before in the bazdar.
Fast, fuss! No, better yuck!)
which means that there is a 50/50 chance that the PNB prediction will be used.
What do you care if PNB redraws it or not? Go fix the last error in the formula;)
Fast, fuss! No, better ew!)
Evil joke, you know I won't find the best for you
You're kidding.
And you don't touch the docent. "...listen Zin, don't touch your brother-in-law...")
And you don't touch the docent. "...listen Zin, don't touch your brother-in-law...")
that's a bad docent.
it's a bad docent.
No, he's not.
you have to understand that economics books are written with a dollar sauce.
you can't go anywhere once you've read them.
so there's only one correct option - self-education, i.e. against the crowd
is a bad docent.
The man has recently had a heart attack and a stroke, he should not be worried. Let him live a little longer. Let him create and enjoy life. Maybe he will come up with something else interesting.
if you look at the formula, it will redraw
I've written somewhere about this before, if there is no mathematical justification for the sample size, then by choosing either 4 or 20 price values, the calculation results are the opposite
which means there is a 50/50 chance of using an EOS forecast
Mmhm )
there is such a thing as Laplace's Demon, which means this formula won't work because it already has the infinity paradox, that is even if the ZPN is correct then the realization of ideas would not be possible, no computer in the world is not able to calculate the future value if it already has an infinity point of the last value, this is the nature algorithm it can not cheat, so this sample will not be the final prediction but only a variationforecast!
The man has recently had a heart attack and a stroke, he should not be worried. Let him live a little longer. Let him create and enjoy life. Maybe he'll come up with something else interesting.
That doesn't give him the right
He is an active and very interesting member, I typed in the search engine and it did not happen that he was not here.
Andrei Fandeyev.