Trend vs Flat - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
ah... another direction... I see))
You will spend the rest of your life looking for a direction and you won't find it))))
Guarantee 100%)
you know a lot...
the formula is untouched
only conclusions now and correct application
your guarantees on the stats, and just because of what i drew
copy ;)))
is it your usual super-secret thing?)
is it this one by any chance?)
(opening of orders happens so that the focus (zero point) is in the red zone)
Can I join in, or are you already in a rivalry?
you know a lot...
the formula hasn't been touched.
only conclusions now and proper application
of course...
I personally found the laws by which the market moves.
most importantly by this law you can find everything except one thing - the direction of price movement.
It was not there and never will be.
I am one hundred per cent sure of that.
Keep wasting your time. Maybe one day you will start to look at things objectively.
Can I join in, or are you already having a get-together?
(I have to.)
You're the one who has no problem thinking objectivelyOf course...
I personally found the laws by which the market moves.
the most important thing about this law is that you can find anything except one thing - the direction of price movement.
It was not there and never will be.
I'm a hundred percent sure of that.
Keep wasting your time. Maybe one day you will start to look at things objectively.
Yeah
And the euro was going down and I didn't predict it.
;)
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/335428/page17#comment_15688749Yeah
The eu was going down and I didn't see it coming.
;)
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/335428/page17#comment_15688749Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy tester
Trend vs Flat
CHINGIZ MUSTAFAEV, 2020.03.31 13:58
Suppose there is a random process.
If one person knows the result of the process a couple of moves ahead, it means that the process is not random for him.
If let's say he told his knowledge to everyone around him, then the process will not be random for everyone.
But that doesn't make an initially random process any less random in a couple of moves.
But the majority will be convinced that the process is not random all the time and was not random before.
Beliefs will lead to random results - win/loss.
The loss of objectivity or its absence from the beginning in the actions of the observer based on his/her beliefs is guesswork.
The market is either more random or less by 3% +- 1.5%. And the belief of people that the market is 90% non-accidental, then accidental - a phenomenon of apotheosis, which leads inevitably to a guessing as a result of the loss of objectivity in the actions performed relatively to the initially random process.
read.
read.
read
But the robot's algorithm only needs and suffices to know the next price move, which will be slightly more than the planned profit
you only need one order to work on one instrument, not an order system
the theorem is proven !need)
You're the one who has no problem thinking objectivelyTwo questions then;
1. The first and second patterns don't raise any questions for me. Where does the third one come from?
2. What is the zero point? The answer is presumed, but an automatic sequel: what is the red zone?
read
But the robot algorithm only needs and suffices to know the next price move, which will be slightly higher than the planned profit
you need only one order to work on one instrument, not the order system
the theorem is proved !You seem to be unfamiliar with how a theorem turns into an axiom.
You need to calculate each step and its reasonability, not just guess and write everything you can think of.
Apparently you are unfamiliar with how a theorem turns into an axiom.
You need to calculate each step and its feasibility, not sit around guessing and writing everything that pops into your head.
What kind of unfounded polemic is this?
Stop being so sarcastic.