On the unequal probability of a price move up or down - page 118
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Still trying to figure out what we're talking about? - in this thread.
- One thing I understand, either you are on interest in the brokerage company or you don't have a real account and you like to speculate.
If you want to invent statistical arbitrage, correlation has nothing to do with it. Two highly correlated instruments can diverge for as long as you like. What matters here is cointegration, not correlation. Read for example here. And compare returns at high correlation and cointegration. Correlation and cointegration are not related and independent concepts.
Have you read the thread in full? I already wrote about it above.
Still trying to figure out what we're talking about? - in this thread.
This thread is not for you - it doesn't do 100% to the deposit per week
This is not the topic for you - it doesn't do 100% to the deposit per week.
there's no sharing here -
- ♪ there's blah, blah, blah ♪
Haven't you read the whole thread? I have already written about it above.
You also do not read, here they mislead you with some different lines, refute and prove some formulas, which are not necessary for the system at all.
In general, they have created a problem to be heroically solved in more than 100 pages.
There's nothing to share here -
- here - blah, blah.
Well I showed the point and told it.
P.S. The other thing is that it hasn't been communicated to anyone. Well that's ok)You don't read it either, it's misleading with some differently worded, refuting and proving some formulas, which are not needed for the system at all.
In general, they have created a problem to be heroically solved in more than 100 pages.
Well I have shown the point and told it.
of course
the system is simpler than an egg.
it's just not working, so they're racking their brains
You don't read it either, it's misleading with some differently worded, refuting and proving some formulas, which are not needed for the system at all.
In general, they have created a problem to be heroically solved in more than 100 pages.
Well I've shown the point and told you.
P.S. The other thing is that it hasn't been communicated to anyone. Well that's ok)No, what you were describing, I understood.
I understood what - you compare currencies in some way and find out the direction of a particular pair?
No, I understood what you were describing.
understood what - you compare currencies in some way and find out the direction of a particular pair?
Sash, I have a funny thought.
You should check with the starter.
of course
the system is simpler than an egg.
It just doesn't work, that's why they're racking their brains.
I have a hunch Perelman is about to be called in to settle the argument.