![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I think he is full of hemp, as he is also trading counter-trends and hopes that the price will turn anyway,
50 years on the picture, no one can withstand such a move, if it catches, you'll sell anyway.
there is no cluster volatility:
chiff's trend record is 36,000 pips 4-digit or 360,000 pips 5-digit
Vaguely understand what clusters are and "why" they are needed
well I wrote:
"Large changes tend to be followed by large changesof any sign, and small changes tend to be followed by small changes - Mandelbrot (1963)"
Except here's a nuance that immediately rejects the usefulness of identifying volatility clusters, highlighted
Alexander Karasev repeatedly gave an example when the signal caused the loss of value on only one trade after a series of profitable trades
The trend is a force that eliminates the need to trade in a flat!
So the conclusion is obvious - there is no need to combine the flat trading strategy with the trend strategy.
Let's discard the flat and have some happiness.
Picture given, you can develop a normal strategy.
So here is the New Year present.
What is the strategy? Briefly
By trend in counter-trend.
On the trend to the counter-trend.
Something about your strategy is not quite clear. You write here that there are no indulators.
You wrote a little earlier.
This is the forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing.
Apophenia
Martin CHEguevara, 2019.12.25 19:20
The point is, look where the last coloured square leads and open trades there anyway.
Anyone who puts trades against the squares representing volatility differences will get sucked in.
There is a lot to say about entry points, but the point is that they don't exist. But the point is that there are no actual POINTS.
Because the market process is a probabilistic process.
There is noise, there is oscillation, and you can just assume that the price will fluctuate higher or lower for a while.
I don't quite understand your strategy. You write here that there are no indices.
A little earlier you wrote
It looks like it's trending no matter how you slice it.
Pouring it up our ears in short
I don't quite understand your strategy. You write here that there are no indices.
Earlier you wrote
It seems to be trending, no matter how you look at it.
Pouring it up our ears, in short.
I see. I'm an advocate of simplicity. Macd, ma & smartphone is enough
I would like to point out that you have been treated to a typical switch of terms.
such as?