Points VS Pips - page 39
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Why do you even look at the profit in pips. What do you want to see in it?
The most objective indicator is points, not money.
Have you tried thinking about it?
The most objective indicator is points, not money.
it will turn out that there are pipsers, almost inside the spread.
personally it just kills me in the 4.5$ signal stats to divide this column by ***lot, which can both 0.01 and 0.02
Dividing $5.56 by 0.03 lot is difficult.
From the same area.
Objective indicators are percentage of growth per unit time (ie how much profit you will get if you use the signal for a while), the drawdown, the load on the deposit (how much risky trade).
From the same area.
Objective indicators are the percentage gain per unit time, the drawdown, the deposit load.
I see reliability not in the percentage gains but in stable pips.
you can play with the percentages, you can't play with the pips.
I see reliability not in percentage gains, but in stable pips.
Pips are nothing. You can make a profit with a small lot, then lose everything with a big lot and a small number of pips. But in pips everything will be fine.
Have you tried thinking about it?
Sometimes I'm not the only one. It's like that on a lot of resources. But you have everything through your lips, so I see no point in arguing
Why argue? Try to use your brain before the last vestiges of it go away.
Pips are an indicator of nothing. You can make a profit with a small lot, then lose everything with a large lot and a small number of pips.
It will be different, it will be based on stable pips.
it will be different, it will be based on stable points
What are "stable points", where do they come from?