ATC.Experience, knowledge and practice. - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Poor devil, he must have sniffed it! Just kidding, of course.
When I served on a navy ship as head of radio engineering service, I had to deal with painting the insides of fresh water storage tanks. Several sailors were lowered into the tanks and after 15 minutes they were changed so as not to be poisoned (the paint was very toxic). (The paint was very toxic.) So when they got a buzz they didn't want to get out and changed the paint and sang songs).
Here, ran mine on EURUSD from 2018.01.19 until today, start 1000, final 4200, entry 2 quid, leverage 500, open up to 50 positions, depo load within 5%, about 10 trades a day
Here, ran mine on EURUSD from 2018.01.19 until today, start 1000, final 4200, entry 2 quid, leverage 500, open up to 50 positions, depo load within 5%, about 10 trades a day
backtest? or forward?
What's the difference? It'sa "strategy tester".
try a different period with the same parameters
created grail.... took 4 years... want to sell 1 copy in auction mode... accepting message with prices here on mql5... waiting for an offer
try to run it for a different period with the same parameters
I've read your thread about martingale and don't understand what the problem is with using elements of martingale in a strategy. We are here to make money, not to defend our principles. If I'm martingale = big risks and loss of securities, there has to be some criteria for those risks. So I return to my question - what conditions must be fulfilled for the bot to be considered normal and acceptable for using it for real money? How "honestly" should you pass a backtest to satisfy these criteria?
In general, what is the framework to fit in, or is there no such framework, and all discussion boils down to smirks and sarcasm (this is not about you).
I've read your thread about martingale and I don't understand what the problem is with using elements of martingale in a strategy. We are here to make money, not to defend our principles. If the martingale = big risks and loss of securities, there has to be some criteria for these risks. So I return to my question - what conditions must be fulfilled for the bot to be considered normal and acceptable for using it for real money? How should the backtest be performed "honestly" in order to meet these criteria?
In general, what is the framework to fit in, or there is no such framework, and all discussion is reduced to smirks and sarcasm (this is not about you).
For testing take x2 x3 spreads from a typical intraday, tp at least x10 spreads. Changes within 20% of key input parameters should not affect profitability result by more than 5%. If sl>tp, then in the size of the resulting sl you make a grid.