Criteria for getting signals to the top - page 5

New comment
 
Georgiy Merts:

3% a year you can't find a deposit ???

So it seemed like all the talk was about monthly returns.

 
Unicornis:

what is the execution date of the last losing order?

2018.04.27 12:56Buy14.00GBPUSD.m1.344292018.06.21 12:021.31036-1988.95-47506.90
The date in the statistics is correct: the trade was held from 27 April to 21 June. The provider had a netting type of orders, so there was always only one cable order in action at a time. All the shares were simply added to it, so the average price is different from what it was on April 27.
 
Vladimir Karputov:

Calculation criteria are a secret under seven locks. So as not to be tempted to adjust the parameters.

Why? Because the criteria do not meet the real needs of investors?!

So let them put a formula, what they really want to see and copy.

And traders, let them adjust the parameters to these real requirements. Let's see how many of them "fit" it.

What's the problem?!

 
jdjahfkahjf:

Why? Because the criteria do not meet the real demands of investors?!

So let them put the formula, what they are really looking for and want to see and copy.

And traders, let them adjust the parameters to these real requirements. Let's see how many of them "fit" it.

What's the problem!!!

11.10.2018 I will finally publish my signals, then you will know what real trading is

 
jdjahfkahjf:

For someone $100 is a big deposit, for someone $1,000 is petty cash.

Yes, that's right. But, as practice shows, those for whom 1000 is a trifle - will never spend it on TS in which they do not believe.


jdjahfkahjf:

In addition, if a person has money for a deposit of 100000, it is a fact that he knows what he is doing!

And large Equities do not mean that a person "knows what he is doing". They only mean that the man is confident in his TS. But, this is already enough to consider this signal worthy of copying. Since the vast majority of people not only do not believe in their own TS, but are even convinced that it is not worth a penny and that what they earn now is just a coincidence. Therefore, we need to "shear the sheep" as quickly as possible, as long as they are willing to pay.

 
Georgiy Merts:

Yes, that's right. But, as practice shows - those for whom 1000 is change - will never spend it on a TC they don't believe in.


And a large Equity - does not at all mean that one "knows what one is doing". They only mean that the person is confident in their TS. But, this is already enough to consider this signal worthy of copying. Since the vast majority of people not only do not believe in their own TS, but are even convinced that it is not worth a penny and that what they earn now is just a coincidence. Therefore, we need to "shear the sheep" as quickly as possible, as long as they are willing to pay.

I disagree. There are a lot of boys born with a gold spoon in their mouths and a lot of girls in the care of "daddies" for whom a deposit of 10K is like going to the restaurant once, and they will trade much more irresponsibly than a man who knows the value of money, knows the volatility of the market and understands that there is no grail, so there is always and all at risk that something will go wrong. That is why he trades responsibly with his 100 quid, making regular withdrawals and strictly adhering to the MM.
 
Georgiy Merts:

Yes, that's right. But practice shows that those for whom 1,000 is small change will never spend it on a TC they don't believe in.


And a big Equity does not mean that one "knows what one is doing". They only mean that the person is confident in his TC. But, this is already enough to consider this signal worthy of copying. Since the vast majority of people not only do not believe in their own TS, but are even convinced that it is not worth a penny and that what they earn now is just a coincidence. Therefore, we need to "shear the sheep" as quickly as possible, as long as they are willing to pay.

Well, confidence, belief, and knowing, knowing what you're doing, are different things.

Many not only believe they are Gods or Napoleons, they even believe in it.

 
I'm sure the MCs value their image. And as practice has shown, there are plenty of people willing to copy.
They said somewhere that more than 500k users have installed the terminals. That is, traders.
Think about it, if you create a competent service of signals, how many copyists will there be? No more?!
How many of those 500 K are real and good traders, and how many of them are just looking for a way to earn some money?
Not all of them are maniacs who spend 25 hours a day looking at 25 charts with 25 indicators each.
And few of them have skills, knowledge and talent to trade well and profitably, and all 7 billion people want to make money.
And if this service (signals) could be arranged competently? And also for Android and iOS, there will be millions and tens of millions of users.
 
Olga Devitsyna:
I disagree. There are a lot of boys who were born with a gold spoon in their mouths and a lot of girls in the care of "daddies" for whom to deposit 10K is like going to the restaurant once, and they will trade much more irresponsibly than a man who knows the value of money, knows the volatility of the market and understands that there is no grail, so there is always and all at risk that something will go wrong. That is why he trades responsibly with 100 quid, making regular withdrawals and strictly following the MM.

Yes, there are a lot of them. But they are very quick to drain their money.

And those who "trade on $100, regularly withdrawing profit" - are just people who know for sure that their trade is not worth a damn. Copying the trades of such punk traders is stupid. Their signal is worth no more than $1 a month.

 
jdjahfkahjf:

Well, certainty, belief, and knowing, knowing what you are doing, are different things.

A lot of people not only believe they're Gods or Napoleons, they even believe it.

Yeah. I agree.

However, far more often you meet people who don't even doubt that the account will be drained. That's why they keep a very small amount in the account, and constantly withdraw profits if there are any. It is precisely the small Equity on the account that shows that the person understands well what his trade is really worth.

But at the same time - if he manages to get a signal to the top - he is glad that he can "trim the sheep" well. And I don't want to be "sheared". So my rule is very clear - it is unacceptable to pay more than 1% of a provider's real Equity per month for a signal.
123456789101112...29
New comment