Creating a GUI for MQLs in graphical mode. - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Alexey, did you manage to create a dll with a form?
I just received an order for an EA with a shape in sharpe today, I'll try it tomorrow. I have not tried it yet.
Not true, I got an order today via VK for a panel, the guy wants strictly external C++/C3 to choose from. I said sharp, of course.
I just got an order today for an EA with a shape on Sharpe, so I'll try it out tomorrow. I haven't tried it yet.
Can you post a simple "template" that doesn't require any manipulation anymore, just add methods and implement what is required? So that there is a simple type transfer, string, structure, open form.... Who thinks what?
How about posting a simple "template" that doesn't require any manipulation anymore, just add methods and implement what is required? So that there is a simple type transfer, string, structure, open form.... Who thinks what?
Better on your blog and with a link in the thread. Only in the subject will get lost in the thread.
Which blog?
What blog?
You can blog here. Click on your name at the top right and there will be a menu on the left. At the very bottom Blog
I mean Peter.
what's the point ? even a very direct DLL still pulls in the whole CLR machine and configures/maintains every call back and forth. First MT works with it, then the bridge, and back in the same order.
Well, except that it's easier to draw - but otherwise, it's a real bummer.
it's easier to slap forms in Delphi, at least there is no artificial neck with managed/unmanaged code
by the way, the last one is a great profit for those who haven't forgotten Delphi yet.
How about posting a simple "template" that doesn't require any manipulation anymore, just add methods and implement what is required? So that there is a simple type transfer, string, structure, open form.... Who thinks what?
Certainly useful, and better really on the blog, it will go in the trash here in 3 days.
what's the point ? even a very direct DLL still pulls in the whole CLR machine and configures/maintains every call back and forth. First MT works with it, then the bridge, and back in the same order.
Except that it's easier to draw - but otherwise it's a pain in the ass.
it's easier to slap forms in Delphi, at least there is no artificial neck with managed/unmanaged code
by the way, the last one is a great profit for those who haven't forgotten Delphi yet.
Didn't Delmfia become .net after 7?
what is the point ? even a very direct DLL still pulls in the whole CLR machine and configures/maintains every call back and forth. First MT works with it, then the bridge, and back in the same order.
Well, except that it's easier to draw - but in all other respects, it's a total bummer.
it's easier to slap forms in Delphi, at least there is no artificial neck with managed/unmanaged code
by the way, the last one is a great profit for those who haven't forgotten Delphi yet.
Let's skip the feminine emotions and go for the numbers. How much load is a CPU put into serving this horrible neck? The CLR engine is constantly running in Windows anyway and we're not the only ones who use it. We are not the only ones who use it. The Windows uses it in the first place.