Expansion of the standard timeframe range towards higher periods - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Who are they? I mean the ones who get it wrong.
The third-party developers of the trading interfaces whose screenshots I've provided under #2 and #3.
You forgot to mention the century and the era in TF... :)
People don't live that long. This would only be good for economic historians who have nothing to do with trading.
Thank you for the good reason to prove the opposite to all who are still in solidarity with you and do not understand the benefits of extending the range, which are not seen at annual levels as a "Once in a lifetime opportunity", but at medium-term levels with lots of possibilities in the range if not days, then at least weeks - which is enough for a huge layer of traders with medium and even lesser number of long-term traders, but still, I suppose.
Here is an illustration of hypermarkets (presumably from multi-month and annual TFs). Built by hand, of course, the indicator does not build it now. Shown from the height of MN. The whole history of the currency pair is displayed. By the frequency of fractals we can see that according to the maximum ТF this is the maximum for them, they will not be wider, but connecting lines of Fibo TimeZones are evidently wider than the nearest fractals:
Here are illustrative results on a smaller timeframe H12. The medium term breaks right on the vertical lines of the Fibo TimeZones are clearly visible here; the large public is squealing in ecstasy:
So how's that for you, Elon Musk? Don't pick on the accuracy of breaks - the markets are approximate, but we are not suckers and we will not go to the market with 1:1000 leverage with the maximum lot, but we will also look at and analyze the younger TFs. And no one has cancelled SL.
By the way, the same effect on other TA charting tools.
Now know and join the cult of Hypertimeframe Witnesses. Knowledge is power!
A fractal there and a fractal there.
What's so surprising about the coincidence?
A fractal there and a fractal there.
What's so surprising about the coincidence?
There is no direct benefit from fractals here, there is a benefit from the technical markup based on them. Once again, look at the trend breaks on the vertical lines of Fibo TimeZones, which just built on the extremums based on fractals and in which(lines Fibo TimeZones) just there is a direct benefit.
People don't live that long. This would only be good for economic historians who have nothing to do with trading.
Many instruments analyse a period before the birth of the analyser.
Incorrectly specified the range of TFs required. Here is the correct one:W2, MN2, MN3, MN4, MN6, Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5.
add C1 C5 C10 (from the word Century) :-) trade so trade ... the Roman denarius is going against the dollar in a relentless trend :-)
add C1 C5 C10 (from the word Century) :-) trade so trade ... Roman denarius is going against the dollar in an inexorable trend :-)
Then, to please gods, we must introduce M - Millennium, but let them, gods, trade by such measures, while mankind began trade just recently comparing to them.
I support the author of this thread in every way possible. The MT set of timeframes lacks 4Mn and 1Y. I understand why many are perplexed by the need for large timeframes, it is not clear why the creators of MT did not include large timeframes in the lineup of timeframes and the impression is that they do not want to include these TFs in the game set.
They should exclude the minute and some (almost all) hourly timeframes from the MT. They should play for real. Stop with 1-cent lot on ticks to bullshit. It's time to become serious people. 1 position - 1 year and . You can hedge an open position while working in a factory or a factory.