From theory to practice - page 1775
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
By the way, that's how the Bank of England threw out the white flag... I mean the regulator's actions and the grid...
They took it out too)))
You always laugh a lot. maybe you have a personality disorder?
If the topic of laughter is brought up, I laugh yes.
Just as long as you're OK , fecking)))))))))
SZS It started with discussion that spread does not disappear when orders overlap, then it spread over several pages of floodplain, then Dannin came and started saying that his balance goes away from equity, why? I don't know why. Finally he showed me a balance chart without equity to prove it )))). What is it?)
Do you even remember who said it?
Joker said))
The counter question is why?
Then you put them on both sides.
Ideally a lock yes. Tighter.
Honestly, thank you all)) It was hilarious.) All positive and kind)))
Only why is it always like this at night, I do not know)))
It's probably a scalper's problem... There's a meme about it too.
Me, after two weeks of scalping...)
In short, you have to "bury" it ;)Ideally, a lock yes. Tighter.
By using opposite nets we can raise equity up to the sky. As long as one of them will not break through :-). Then 0. Which, by the way, is a guaranteed result.
Two opposite grids are set with a gap between them; as soon as profit on all orders (except the best one) exceeds spread, swaps, commissions (optional minimum for a pocket) they are closed immediately and the grid is built on.
This results in two orders in the market that gradually diverge in different directions - sell at the top and buy at the bottom.
Of course we can close them, take a screenshot and post it on the forum for everyone to cringe...which is what people often do
As a matter of fact, we can raise equity by means of opposite nets. As long as one of them will not break through:-). Then it will immediately reach 0. Which, by the way, is a guaranteed result.
Two opposite grids are set with a gap between them; as soon as profit on all orders (except the best one) exceeds spreads, swaps, commissions (optional minimum for the pocket), they are immediately closed, and the grid is expanded further.
This results in two orders in the market that gradually diverge in different directions - sell at the top and buy at the bottom.
Of course we can close them, take a screenshot and post it on the forum for everyone to cringe...which is what people often do
What does it mean?
I will be brief.
In reply toMartin CHEguevara' s statistics
What does this mean?
You don't have to believe me, but take a look at the facts;)if you are interested)))