From theory to practice - page 1625
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In short, it makes sense to look for something in forex if
а)
1. you have found a broker you can trust with a couple of millions
2. you make more than 100% a year with a maximum drawdown of not more than 15-20% with 10 years of tests and spreads are two to three times higher than the maximum ona real account well take an average of about 50 points on the five-digit
б)
1.you do 100% a week ... here the drawdown is out of the question))
2.You have found a broker who by his own stupidity will withdraw your money)
point a)1 and b)1 are incompatible...and if you try this, you will inevitably lose everything you have.They come in, the goods are sold and they buy at 10. What do we do? Do we buy or sell?
parity, that's not going to happen.
How do we decide? If both - where do we start and why?
above
parity, that's not going to happen
How do I know what is being sold or bought one number 10 at a time?
PRP_LINE is the probability that the price will not break the previous low of a candle having broken the previous high and vice versa.
And it is everywhere on all TFs and instruments above 70% at least for the last 10 years.
If executed 1 otherwise 0. Then slip in a cumulative amount, on n1 for example, per diem...
How do you know what is being sold or bought now by one number 10?
I lied above, it's possible.
The puppet will only draw one high-flying figure.
there are only 3 of them.
think about it yourself.
this is taboo and will clarify how to make the formula
one is like this (centre):
the second one (centre):
The third is the answer to your question.
I lied above, it's possible
the puppet draws only one aerobatics figure.
there are only 3 of them.
think about it yourself.
this is taboo and will clarify how to make the formula
one is like this (centre):
the second one (centre):
the third is the answer to your question
OK, I see, copied from Ilyusha the Woodcutter))))
OK, I see, copied from Ilyusha the Woodcutter)))
So be it.
I feel better.
but above I only showed external signs that TC doesn't need
;)
So be it.
I feel safer.
;)
Come on, let's have a third piece of light...
If 1 is fulfilled otherwise 0. Then succumb to the cumulative sum, on n1 for example, daily...
is a multiplication of probabilities, i.e. the occurrence of an actually joint event.
p = 0.8*0.8... lim[A(0...1)](P(p)) -> 0
is useless.
But above I only showed external signs, which TC doesn't need
;)
It's not that simple.