From theory to practice - page 1413

 
Alexander_K:

The top chart is a desperate battle against a random process using the MA and the channel around it. The result is strictly +0% profit, etc.

Lower chart - a random process is bluntly outplayed using Koldun's algorithm (by the way - where is he? Is he alive? I'm worried about something...).

The problem is that real BP is not exactly Laplace motion, it's a bit more complicated...

No, the problem is that you have to trade on the upper chart, not on the lower.

Accordingly, the properties of the lower chart are of little help to you.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

what is the algorithm?

Ask him :)))

 
Alexander_K:

Ask him :)))

Well, then it's not clear.

do you know how to get such a schedule yourself?

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Well, that doesn't make any sense.

do you know how to get a timetable like that yourself?

Naturally. The way is described in this thread... However, trends sometimes sting - the market is not exactly a random process... And dumb forum users, instead of working on the indicators of discontinuity(autocorrelation, entropy, Hirst, etc.) suffer cretinism.

 
Alexander_K:

Naturally. The way is sort of described in this thread... However, trends sometimes sting - the market is not exactly a random process... And the dumbass forum users, instead of working on the discontinuity indicators (autocorrelation, entropy, Hirst, etc.) are suffering from cretinism.

orientate roughly - beginning, middle?
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
Can you give me a rough idea - beginning, middle?

In the beginning somewhere....

 

Jesus... to clutter up the thread and then ask where to look for what

Rena, kill yourself...

 
Alexander_K:

In addition to this post:


there is at least 1 other way to overcome random process and it is described in this thread.

Take Laplace motion and look:

We see:

The top chart is a desperate fight against a random process with MA and a channel around it. The result is strictly +0% profit, h.p.

Lower chart - a random process is bluntly outplayed using Warlock's algorithm (by the way - where is he? Is he alive? I'm worried about something...).

The problem is that real BP isn't exactly Laplace motion, it's a bit more complicated...

So, if dull-witted sufferers would learn to reduce real BP to a random process, or use indicators to separate trendy, deterministic movements, then there would be no problem... ....

Alas, on this forum, only the blindfolded stare into the monitor screen and suffer from dibilism. Ugh...

No doubt, everyone is stupid and dumb. But you're a good one too, you just shine with intelligence - a year and a half of torturing a system that takes a month to do, and which everyone has long since sucked up and abandoned for lack of use).
Are you going to keep walking around looking for used Graalis?
 
Alexander_K:

Now, if the dull-witted sufferers could learn to reduce real BP to a random process, or separate out trending, deterministic movements with breakdown indicators, there would be no problem....


And the main thing is that these dullards would be drunk and post all their secrets here. It's not for nothing that all local gurus and geniuses sometimes visit the forum.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

what is the algorithm?


It's been discussed here 1000 times already, stop slowing down.