You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
.
A stably dysfunctional model is not usually used for real trading. And it does not create risks.
I am just discussing models that work, even work for a long time, but necessarily drain the deposit. Let's watch the signals. There are no other ones.
That's why the proof of an Expert Advisor's performance lies in a theoretical proof. For the discussed GARCH, it is making decision on the stationary series.
Let the address of Alpari (UK) Limited 201 Bishopsgate London, EC2M 3AB United Kingdom be on the small banana island of the UK, fine. However, I wouldn't argue with the view that the European peninsula gives bad licences either. It's a matter of taste.
Haven't dealt with the London one, but judging by the refund I got - it was an offshore with a London sign with all that implies.
What follows? No government regulation
Everything else is trivial, and the above are the main risks.
SanSanych, tell me honestly. These Archie GARCHs of yours. Are they making you money themselves?
I don't know how to do GARCH, I'm trying to set up a machine learning-like hangout.
Machine learning has a real EA - a mixture of a random forest and indicators. My indicators, as well as all others, are based on NOT stationary data, so they periodically strive to drain depo. Although, financial problems I had 2 years ago I managed to solve them in a year. I'm trying to replace it with GARCH, for which there is some evidence of future behaviour. But GARCH turned out to be too complicated.
So join GARCH.
I don't know how to make GARCH, I'm trying to organise a hangout similar to machine learning.
But GARCH appeared too complicated.
So join GARCH.
Where is the logic in this? It didn't work for me, but you join in. I feel like I've been sent out in a subtle way.
Logic?
GARCH is mainstream on financial markets, I`ve been using it for some months, the result will appear, but not so quickly, as I thought at the beginning.
-You said Garch Arch Aphirma's power...
Do you want to make fun of me?
Well, well...
Logic?
GARCH is mainstream in the financial markets, I've been doing it for a couple of months, there will definitely be results, but not as quickly as I thought at first.
And I'm in trouble - yesterday after the publication of Non-Farm data I should have had a great deal on AUDCAD, but because of an error in the program (see post #1141, where AUDCAD opening/closing commands were written to AUDCHF file...) I got negative on AUDCHF... This is what New Year's Eve drinking and complete stupefaction due to it... I'm going for a walk with my wife to VDNH now. If you see a man and his wife crying, that's me.
Where am I to fall back on results obtained by simply measuring real data?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page19#comment_6168925"Before multiplication, the values on the curves shown differed by a factor of 18, after multiplication they differed by a factor of 20. It's about the law of the square root."
To the unrealistic, or what?
Pretty sure your law of the root of t is only true for your method of data reception and no more. This law is not true for receiving 5-digit ticks and it is more accurate to use this exact formula for price deviation:
S = sqrt(N*mean(|Ask(t)-Ask(t-1)|)), where N is the number of ticks during observation time t.