From theory to practice - page 1194

 
Renat Akhtyamov:
well of course not to be confused

now I can do thatXDDD

ahahaha)))

supergreat grail XDDDD

(stunt performed by a professional don't repeat this at home)

XDDDD

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Well, of course, not to confuse

He's making all the indices redraw.


What a tricky system...

By the way, I've seen your posts about emissions. You learned how to find it a long time ago.)

I think you called it a slam dunk.)

 
Martin Cheguevara:

now I can do thatXDDD

ahahaha)))

supergreat grail XDDDD

(stunt performed by a professional don't repeat this at home)

XDDDD

did you reinvest?

40% drawdown

OK, so...

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

Not two, just a huge number of mediums. Get it?

I don't get it.

 
Martin Cheguevara:

aha no matter that the EUR has been a single currency since 1971)))

Just to educate; there was no Euro in 1971, it was EKU=1.2 dollars hard. Cash only.

 
Martin Cheguevara:

What a tricky system...

I've seen your posts about emissions, by the way. You learned to find it a long time ago.)

I think you called it a collapse.)

Wrong way.

but i've been through a lot of strategies, i agree.

which one you're holding on to, it's hard to tell from the outside.
 

I am surprised.

I am astonished. Not just anyone, but Marx (!!!) comes to the forefront, though without Engels, who is lost somewhere, but he will come back to the stage) and says:

Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies

From theory to practice

Max, 2019.04.20 17:45

Bro, I've been looking for the grail since 2003. And I'm not happy with less than 20% per month myself, but it can't be helped. My trading robots dozens of them, analysing the market from beginning to end for market inefficiencies, all they say is the same - the maximum we are given is transactions on abnormal movements, towards balance, with take and stop not less than spread*30 (otherwise it's more profitable to go to the casino). Sad, but true. Seldom but well is our motto.

It would seem that a person with experience is writing and giving specific figures and research directions.

However, no one(!!!) asked him anything, did not specify even the smallest detail... All at a gallop, to the best of their ability, rushing forward, filling the branch with flooding.

I don't pity the thread, piss on it. I feel sorry for the forum. It has turned from a citadel of trader's physical and mathematical thoughts into a hive of I don't even know who... A lame-ass child, apparently. And some kind of suspicious old...

Ugh, one more time. At least bring back the Sorcerer and Asaulenka!




 
Alexander_K:

I am surprised.

Not just anyone, but Marx(!!!) comes to the forefront, though without Engels, who is lost somewhere, but he will come along) and speaks:

It would seem that a man with experience is writing and giving specific figures and directions of research.

However, no one(!!!) asked him anything, did not specify even the smallest detail ... All at a gallop, to the best of their ability, rushing forward, filling the branch with flooding.

I don't pity the thread, piss on it. I feel sorry for the forum. From a citadel of trader's physical and mathematical thought it has turned into a hive of I don't even know who... A lame-ass child, apparently. And some suspicious old man...

Ugh, one more time. At least bring back the Sorcerer and Asaulenka!

The details were - some kind of filter...

did you read it, it said about the filter and the middle ...? ?

if you don't understand, time will tell
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

The details were - some kind of filter

do you read it yourself?

Of course I do. Some kind of ppm's... I don't know what it is. I thought someone would ask. No way! What's that? I'm seeing a complete stupefaction and loss of interest in research. Only elderly Tarabanov offers quality poo to all, and the late Reshetov's teacher is still bothering me - it's crazy.

I am very disappointed.