![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You are undoubtedly right, not many people have the patience to endure the rigours of a year or two . Programmers don't count. They are in the market business.
Just for this expectation we can thank such people very much.
Can you imagine if everyone started pulling their prices?
Well, it would be total chaos, anarchy, so to speak...
Andrey Kisselyov:
люди не могут формализовать что такое тренд, а вы им задачки по цене задаете.
с уважением.
Oleg avtomat:
Someone can formalise what a trend is. Someone cannot formalise what a trend is.
Can you formalize what a trend is?
Without understanding what a trend is, you cannot formalize this trend. In this case, it's like in a fairy tale: "Go there, I don't know where; find this, I don't know what".
That is, first there must be understanding, and then the task of formalization can be set.
Correct formalization is the key to success. There may be many variants of formalization, and the task may be formalized in many different ways.
For example, the result of one of the many possible variants of formalization is as follows:
Here, the indicator determines the current state of the process on its own, and gives recommendations for action.
Without an understanding of what a trend is, there is no way to formalise the trend. In this case, it is like in a fairy tale: "go there, I don't know where; find this, I don't know what".
That is, first there must be understanding, and then the task of formalization can be set.
Correct formalization is the key to success. There may be many variants of formalization, and the task may be formalized in many different ways.
For example, the result of one of the many possible variants of formalization is as follows:
Here, the indicator determines the current state of the process on its own, and gives recommendations for action.
The more variants for understanding, the higher the result))
I never refuse to listen to a new idea.
What is the golden line? What does it do?
You've played the game and that's enough. Now think about it a little bit.
How long has the mcl forum existed?
how long have most users' accounts in this thread existed?
What is the age of this question?
You don't have to answer me.
The more options you have for understanding, the better the result.)
I never refuse to listen to a new idea.
What is the golden line? What does it do?
How do you draw turkeys - left to right or right to left?
Try it both ways.
It will be exactly the same.
You've played the game and that's enough. Now think about it a little bit.
How long has the mcl forum existed?
how long have most users' accounts in this thread existed?
What is the age of this question?
You don't have to answer me.
You may as well not post in vain.
How do you draw the turkeys - left to right or right to left?
Try it both ways.
It will be exactly the same.
No. Your statement is not quite right.
No. Your statement is not quite correct.
It's not a statement, it's experience from practice.
Not every indicator will show the same values when recalculating left and right. Don't mess with my head. I had some kebabs and wanted to read the branch in peace.
Not every indicator will show the same values when recalculating left and right. Don't mess with my head. I had some kebabs and wanted to read the thread in peace.
Well, if so, then I understand.
Probably, I blurted it out for nothing, because you have to think it out.
For example.
The candle on the right covers the candles on the left and vice versa...........