You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The signal service was right to show when the signal started to be monitored, you should have at least watched them trade in real life for a while.
So I didn't say they were wrong) It's just that there is no point.
D)))))
Metacquotes, such metacquotes.
The last one who drained 500 subscribers had a 10% drawdown, that's low risk, lots of subscribers, and what would that get you?
Such a signal has ruined its history and cannot ever return to the "low risk" section, but I think low risk in the rating should not only be based on the drawdown level. For example, the signal should combine at least the drawdown, necessarily closed month in the plus, profitability, time... and of course the one who has the best results is ahead)) Of course, ideally there are many other indicators, but I would already be so interested in search and competition.
Yes, it's kind of wrong that the numbers are missing.