and wandering around randomly again... - page 27
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Apparently you only have one random entry, the very first in the series on one of your accounts? You don't use stops and takeaways, you close at some level of profit of the aggregate position. Or, you do, but in such a manner that the Take levels of the compensator's orders coincide in size with the Stop levels of the grid orders.
With me it looks more like a device that converts sea surf water level fluctuations into air reserves in a storage reservoir.
The direction of each 'node' can of course be described as random, but clearly it does not matter. The main thing is that they are directed in opposite directions.
Some parts of the system use takeovers, others use stops. But, the "mechanism" never stops (no closing on aggregate)
As you understand, the most difficult thing was to think up a way for such "generator" not to be "flooded by the tide"
("tides" in Forex - you know
). But, with "floats", the system smoothly follows "the tides, extracting energy from the shallow sea disturbance" (
, damn well said...).
It looks more like a device to me, converting the fluctuating water level of the sea surf into an air supply in a storage reservoir.
The direction of each 'node' can of course be described as random, but clearly it does not matter. The main thing is that they are directed in opposite directions.
Some parts of the system use takeovers, others use stops. But, the "mechanism" never stops (no closing on aggregate)
You understand that the most difficult thing was to think up a way to prevent this "generator" from being "flooded by the high tide" ("high tide" in Forex, you know it yourself). But, with "floats", the system smoothly follows "the tides, extracting energy from the shallow sea tide" ("hell, beautifully put...)
a device which transforms the fluctuation of the sea surf water level to accelerate electromagnetic induction arising at the junction of wind generator resistance with the force of lunar phases during tides, into air reserves in an ionosphere storage receiver, in order to concentrate aether energy at decision-making point formed by synapses during brain self-powering through this very aether.
You understand that the most difficult thing was to find a staf during its creation, so that such a "generator" would not be "flooded by the tide" ("tides" in Forex, you know). But, with "floats" the system smoothly follows "the tides, extracting energy from the shallow sea disturbance" ( damn, nicely put...).
It looks more like a device to me, converting the fluctuating water level of the sea surf into an air supply in a storage reservoir.
The direction of each 'node' can of course be described as random, but clearly it does not matter. The main thing is that they are directed in opposite directions.
Some parts of the system use takeovers, others use stops. But, the "mechanism" never stops (no closing on aggregate)
You understand that the most difficult thing was to think up a way to prevent this "generator" from being "flooded by the high tide" ("high tide" in Forex, you know it yourself). But, with "floats", the system smoothly follows "the tides, extracting energy from the shallow sea disturbance" ( damn, nicely put...).
What currency pair do you work on?
Well, I told you before: Poundbucks.
Well, I told you before: on the poundbucks.
I'm getting more and more like a device that converts the fluctuation of the water level
fluctuating water levels = fluctuating statistics?
In a general sense, yes... You could say that...
Well, I told you before: on the poundbuck.
It looks more like a device to me, converting the fluctuating water level of the sea surf into an air supply in a storage reservoir.
The direction of each 'node' can of course be described as random, but clearly it does not matter. The main thing is that they are directed in opposite directions.
Some parts of the system use takeovers, others use stops. But, the "mechanism" never stops (no closing on aggregate)
You understand that the most difficult thing was to think up a way to prevent this "generator" from being "flooded by the high tide" ("high tide" in Forex, you know it yourself). But, with "floats", the system smoothly follows "the tides, extracting energy from the shallow sea disturbance" ( damn, nicely put...).