and wandering around randomly again... - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You shouldn't do that. The young man here publishes interesting and unusual ideas that might provide food for thought for inquiring minds. After all, maybe this is just the case, when a brilliant man is not understood, because he is ahead of his time. And perhaps he is holding a grail in his hands, which many people dream about. It is quite possible that its essence is as simple as Columbus egg, while the difficulty was only in finding such a simple and elegant solution. As far as I can see, lot manipulation ensures positive profit when entering the market at random. The mechanism of lot manipulation remains to be considered.
Too bad, of course, that he doesn't appear to have an expert on this system. The test run on history would have confirmed his words about success of his TS.
As for the moolah, he has been trading with the moolah for a year. he spews out thousands of words of rubbish. talking to him is not going to result in anything good. he is just wasting our time.
He believes in martingale. he probably lost more than once. but of course, he attributes it to "an unfinished system".
I tell you about this effect...
if you go to a casino with a large sum of money and play a couple of times on the matrix, you're likely to make a profit.
but you're not going to stop there. you're going to use martingale to make money. you'll go to the casino tomorrow and the next day and so on...
The more you go to the casino, the more you'll increase the odds that you'll come to a point where you need to bet xxxxxx dollars, which you just don't have.
Why is there this effect that if you play mvrtingale a few times, you can make a few dollars.
If 1001 people in different corners of the world went to a casino that night, bringing a thousand quid with them, with the plan to win 1 quid and walk away,
then 1,000 of them would win a quid and one would lose $1,000.
It's been explained to you that it's a lottery.
And it has already been explained to you that this "effect" occurs IN THE CASE of "criminal" inaction during a Price Gap with powerful profit potential.
Don't you get it that you can't just watch the price go against you... AND YOU CAN'T GET ANYTHING OUT OF IT !!!!!!!!
Argue ...
Oh! Again! Write some nonsense and say "argue that I'm wrong!"
I said "the one who puts forward the theory should prove it, not everyone around him should prove him wrong."
... "He who proposes the theory must prove it...
Where's the mistake?https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/193378/page7#comment_5114826
Where's the mistake here... https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/193378/page7#comment_5114826
again....
"prove to me where there's a mistake here and that I'm wrong" ))))))))))
And it has already been explained to you that this "effect" occurs IN THE CASE of "criminal" inaction during a price move that has a powerful profit potential
Don't you get it that you can't just watch the price go against you... AND YOU CAN'T GET ANYTHING OUT OF IT !!!!!!!!
what can you prove to a martingale? ....
Don't talk nonsense. No ideas. And he's not just talking about markets, he's talking about any process that has movement, as long as it's not a curve like a corpse on a meter, including the market.
The market is not a sb. That's why some strategies with random entry but non-random volumes can be assumed there.
How quickly forum talkers run away from an offer to show the state or monitoring...
Do you want me to show you on apples that if you add two apples to two apples, you get four apples?
Can't you see that with your mind...?
I don't give a shit about the words of someone who can't even make sense of the MA here on his own.
Ah, there you go, geniuses don't condescend to communicate with a man of less than 1000 posts and knowledge of exactly mkl level 80. Well then yes, then of course, an argument.
Nothing to say on the substance of the post, let's run through the personality. A bit shallow for an 8K post, you could have come up with something more subtle.