Registration for the MetaQuotes-Demo Championships in May - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Please sign up for May
Please sign up for May
Oleg , and you are welcome to the May Championship!
... Good! MT5 is gaining momentum, I do not understand those who are still sitting in the dying 4
All who participated in April - go to May. Who will be in May - automatically but at will in the next championship after May ...
Monitoring in May is planned similar to http://mvs.hol.es/Monitoring/ for May a different link is planned.
Trading Championship May
You need to open an account on the server MetaQuotes-Demo, deposit 10000$ leverage 100, you can trade on the platform mt5 ( hedge/netting ) or mt4. Register as a signal, and post the application in this thread.
The entry form is as follows. But you can do it in a looser form. IMPORTANT, do not start trading before 01.05.2017
User must be verified to exclude duplicate nicknames. 01.05.2017 - 02.06.2017.
There are no other restrictions.
The winner will be determined by the maximum equity on Friday 02.06.2017 after the end of the trading session.
You can register now, for MT4 terminals the problem with delays of quotes is solved.Trading Championship English https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/188046
Denis Chugrin
Alexander Ivanov
Vladimir Zubov
Serhii Shevchuk
Vladimir Gorbachev
Vladimir Gorbachev
April sparring is going on - so far the flight is normal (preparation for May)
All organized by members of this project, who wish to sponsor, welcome to the project, can assign a prize $
There is no pathos - there are enthusiasts
MQ - no one owes anyone anything, thanks for providing their services, bow bow
The purpose of the project is multifunctional, including to show one's worth, to look at others - everything is open.
Well, think about it, MQ Championships 300-500 participants, you have 40.
What you do is limited to parsing the signals service and identifying the best signals.
In principle, such a table can be created and published without any competition, just for yourself.
The essence of contests (let's call it a Championship or a Cup, whatever you want) comes to the fans' audience, the advertising of participants is the main goal of all contests.
Well, if you hold a championship, what long term profits will the participants get, after the branch sinks?
Look, Better is still remembered (as the winner of the championship with a neuronet), although it's a long time since he appears here.
Well it's not correct to compare MQ's large-scale championships with the great organisation we had, but they're in the past now. Nikolai, it's always interesting to do something. Of course 40 people is not enough - the deadline is only a month, few people know, there is no prize fund.
Well, think about it, MQ Championships 300-500 participants, you have 40.
What you are doing is parsing the signals service and identifying the best signals.
In principle, such a table can be compiled without any competition, just for yourself, and published.
The essence of contests (let's call it a Championship or a Cup, whatever you want) comes to the fans' audience, the advertising of participants is the main goal of all contests.
Well, if you hold a championship, what long term profits will the participants get, after the branch sinks?
Look, Better is still remembered (as the winner of the championship with a neuronet), although it's a hundred years ago and does not appear here.
Why judge, everything is fine. Now 40, June - August - 300 - 1000 people, because no one is immune :) Where the number, there are sponsors ( and why are all the pessimists )))) )
In principle, you can do anything, if you want to.
Yes, whatever it is called, it is a long term project. Join
Added: There were people here who didn't expect to see even five participants.....
Then you have broken the contract. And in terms of the competition - the contract is the rules.
Your investor will tolerate as long as the account is alive and will talk differently in case the account is drained by one drawdown and in case there were 10 attempts to stop trading in time.
My point about 6% is that such small drawdowns would be insane to use in a contest. Not the most successful will reach the finish line, but the most cautious and with the minimum profit.
Many contests have a white list and a grey list, with the grey list just showing the % of depo growth and that's it. And the white list has different conditions.
My point about 6% is that such small drawdowns are insane to apply to a contest. Not the most successful will reach the finish line, but the most cautious and with the minimum profit.
Many contests have a white list and a grey list, with the grey list simply showing the % increase in depo and that's it. The white list has different conditions.
Suggest it, there is still plenty of time.
It is incorrect to compare MQ's large-scale championships with the great organization we had, but they are in the past now. Nikolay, it's always interesting to do something. Of course 40 people is not enough - the deadline is only a month, not many people know, there is no prize fund.
The big journey starts with a small step. I was also skeptical, thought people prryryndit, as usual and will calm down. But no ))
By the way, for me this contest is a huge incentive to beat the damn laziness and finally finish the Expert Advisor for MT5, some kind of spring stagnation.
My point about 6% is that such small drawdowns are insane to apply to a contest. It is not the most successful who will come to the finish line, but the most cautious and with a minimum profit.
Many contests have a white list and a grey list. And the white list has different conditions.
I think you misunderstand the point about the drawdown limit. It may reach any size by the end of the contest. That is, the total drawdown may be 99%. And the participant will be able to win. The essence of the drawdown limitation is that the total drawdown of OPEN POINTS must not exceed X% (let it be 20%).
I.e. if you have entered "all" and want to keep the competition - fix the loss at 19%. And again you enter on everything!
I think you misunderstand the proposed drawdown limit. It can reach any size by the end of the competition. That is, the total drawdown can be 99%. And the participant will be able to win. The essence of the drawdown limitation is that the total drawdown of OPEN POINTS must not exceed X% (let it be 20%).
I.e. if you have entered "all" and want to keep the competition - fix the loss at 19%. And again you enter on everything!