Would anyone be willing to work in a group?

 

As you know, to make a handle for a hammer, the efforts of one craftsman are sufficient, but to make a more complex tool or mechanism, it is preferable to use the experience and capabilities of several craftsmen.

As they say, one man is not a soldier in the field.

Even ants and bees came before that))) Are we stupider than bees?

Are there people who would like to work in a group in the financial markets?

I should warn you right away that this is not a study group, but a group for working together.

It may upset some people, but they should have at least 3 years of experience in the markets. My experience is more than 10 years.

Programming skills are welcome but not required.

In order not to get into a barrage of critics write in a personal if you hesitate. Specify your experience, abilities and capabilities.

Selection in the group for an interview. Or as a variant to put the problem in the public domain, accept the proposal for implementation, not brought to the proposal sift out. It is possible to include a ball system for quality. We will discuss it later.

We will work together on a contractual basis, remotely, without an office at this stage.

The choice is yours, ladies and gentlemen.

 
Give me the money, we'll work as a group. I don't see the specifics.
 
Uladzimir Izerski:

Selection to the group by interview. Or alternatively, set an open-access task, accept a proposal for implementation, and reject those who do not submit a proposal. We could include a ballot system for quality. We will discuss it later.

Have you been interviewed yet? )))
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
Give me the money, we'll work as a group. I don't see the specifics.

No one gives money away for nothing. It has to be earned through physical strength or intelligence. Who can do what.
 
Stanislav Aksenov:
Have you been interviewed yet? )))

No applicants have shown up for the group yet except for me. Yuri is ready but he wants money up front).
 

Everyone has a different level of programming and availability of free time - I propose to initially make a criterion - which means the availability of free time, also a little financial independence.


And the essence of huge projects is not to do everything alone, but each performs his function..... So, it is a utopian idea)

people with enormous resource capacity are also welcome - really enormous, for example MTS has over 1000 of the latest xeons.... that's like 64,000 cores, which is actually several times the size of the entire local cloud

And also anything of value, e.g. 25 years of tick history for all global instruments or something similar (not to be confused with a few years of history from a brokerage house)

 
Alexandr Andreev:

Everyone has a different level of programming and availability of free time - I propose to initially reduce the criteria - it means availability of free time, also a little financial independence.


Otherwise, the essence of large projects is that everyone does not do everything alone and each performs his function..... So this is a utopian idea)


The best way to be independent is unity.

You can grow a huge project from a small one. Everyone starts small.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

No applicants have shown up for the group yet except for me. Yuri is ready, but he wants money up front.)

Exactly. First the money, then the chairs.

We're well fed as it is, but it never hurts to have extra.

 

No one is forcing anyone to do anything.

If someone thinks it is better to work alone, let him or her work alone. But there are people who are willing and able to work in a group. I will try to find them.

As soon as there is a group, we will set tasks and divide responsibilities. I have experience. I set up a company from scratch.

 
You didn't write the most important thing, what is the purpose of the group?
 
Evgeny Belyaev:
You haven't written the most important thing, what is the aim of the group?

In the long term, to set up an investment company.