Direction of the subsequent tick - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, who's too lazy to look:
Let R be tails and O be heads.
There will be more combinations such as R-O or O-R than combinations such as:
R-O or R-R.
Magicians?
Answering a question with a question is your thing, change your linguistic style on one of your accounts.
The words parasites give you away!
Answering a question with a question is your thing, change your linguistic style on one of your accounts.
The words parasites give you away!
Having two accounts is forbidden by forum rules.
What's with the magicians?
Having two accounts is forbidden under the forum rules.
What kind of magicians?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/168395/page4
https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/integer
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/168395/page4
https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/integer
You're funny ) arguing, proving something to each other but no one bothers to check.
I "DID" it a long time ago.
I even listed the methods of "verification".
You're funny ) arguing, proving something to each other but no one bothers to check.
Well, who's too lazy to look:
Let R be tails and O be heads.
There will be more combinations such as R-O or O-R than combinations such as:
R-O or R-R.
But it's funnier with quartets - in a random stream the probability of catching OPOP is slightly higher than OPPO...but this is just a trick with self-prefixed combinations and conditional probabilities
I saw the tests a long time ago. It's not the probability there, it's the psychology of the crowd.
Generally speaking, after a pullback, then a further breakout of the top of the momentum, those who stand on the breakout usually close by putting a SL behind the base of the momentum. Then go the distance of 0.6 of an impulse and try to close sooner. It's not just a classic fibo, sort of. It is, firstly, psychology: it is easier to close earlier with profit than to risk further. Secondly, sort of like a classic (fibo! authority), but in fact the ratio of TP to SL is almost 1:2. Profitable in the short term, but most often unprofitable in the long term.
And the point is that most traders just put TP at a distance of 0.6 of an impulse, i.e. without passing its full distance. Even fewer place TPs at a distance of 1:1 from the SL. And quite a minority place TPs at a distance of slightly more than one from the impulse.
And, the further the price goes along the trend, the more one of the parties (bulls or bears) gets into the trend, stopping it by overbought or oversold. Just the market will often stop behind the line, the distance to which is greater than from the opening price to the SL.
And up to the SL, the price will move as before, 50/50. That is, 50% to the SL and 50% to a point above the TP equal to the SL.
And it turns out that he, who sets TP at a distance of 0.6 from the SL in the long term will gradually lose, and he, who sets TP at a distance of 1.1/1.2/1.3... from the SL, will be a plus in the long run.
That dude wrote an article about it, and gave EA testing charts, but that was a long time ago, it seemed too much of a hassle to me at the time, I didn't save the proof.