![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The theme was about choosing worthy to get immortality, it is obvious, the word-worthy does not mean anything, under such a deep word worthy, will be a man who has a mountain of dough, as we all know who has a lot of dough, the man is obviously not worthy ... that's the way the world works.
In any case, immortality will not be good for the planet. It is already contaminated by people and it will only get worse from here.
Watch the Discovery film"Why? Questions of the Universe. Can we live forever?"It talks about brain capacity and other pitfalls. It describes a way to prolong existence of a primordially mortal man. A lie is a lie, but there's a hint in it, as they say.
There is another way, in DNA of each cell there is a site which with each division of this cell shortens, it is responsible for the number of cell divisions, as soon as this site exhausts itself, the cell will divide with defects, or in general dies. If there is a majority of such depleted cells, then the organism dies of old age. And here the thought occurs - why not to tweak the genome a bit so that with each division of cells this part of the cell does not become shorter? It promises eternal youth.
But the question arises: a man begins as a single cell and the cells specialize and form organs and the organism in general. But after such interference we may get just a piece of protoplasm with ever-dividing identical cells? Who will need it? And even if we receive a complete organism, can we consider it human? After all, genetically it is not a descendant of its ancestors at all. This will not save us from various illnesses and diseases including those acquired in addition to changes in genome.
Legally it is rather a clone - a mutant, and their rights are not described anywhere, because human cloning is forbidden everywhere.
But there is also an ethical side, the psychology of ordinary people. In general, one must begin from laws and psycho-type corrections for all population of the planet, a great brainwashing must be done to psychologically prepare common people for such GMO-replacers. Otherwise, there will be revolts, wars and all the other "charms" of social and material inequality.
And the "eternal" must also be somehow limited in the sense of reproduction, or the ball will not feed all, it is also to change the genome, so that, for example, ovulation depending on the population, if individuals are a billion - no more reproduction, until someone dies.
And you are going to solve all these issues within one country, even one organization, somewhere in the periphery? With money from forex trading, not even the stock exchange? It's petty, any corporation would crush it and not notice.
We need to try it on mice first
We are making the button ourselves and have already made serious progress in this direction. We only need a programmer to increase the speed of the process.
Immodest question, what salary you plan to pay the programmer, for his work knowledge, skills in the manufacture of buttons BABLO. You can just voice the order.
I repeat: a programmer is not required to make a BABLO button. That's what other people do.
The programmer is only required to create code according to the TOR (strange, isn't it?).
Remuneration is absolutely adequate to the complexity of the work and depends on knowledge and experience.
That's right, in the end the planet will be populated by soulless, terminators of some sort, there will be little left of human beings.
You're evil. You have no humanity and no faith in humanity.
You're evil. You have no humanity and no faith in humanity.
You're one to talk. Ioann Vassilyevich would have put him on the stake for freethinking, not to corrupt the minds of his serfs :)
You're one to talk. Ioann Vassilyevich would have been impaled for freethinking, so as not to corrupt the minds of the serfs :)
Yes, he would. But only for good.