A programmer is needed to create immortality - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Do you get bored of living or doing the same thing? If you get bored with science, you can take up literature or music.
How facile your reasoning is! To become and be a professional, you have to study well from childhood and keep working on yourself all your life!
Have you even studied science?!
How facile your reasoning is! To become and be a professional, you have to learn well from childhood and keep working on yourself all your life!
OK, lived, 500 years have passed. What's next? An offer has been made to prolong life, are you going to refuse and say goodbye?
I think it's almost impossible to learn everything - not even eternity is enough, given that the amount of information is constantly increasing exponentially.
Watch the Discovery film"Why? Questions of the Universe. Can we live forever?"It's all about brain capacity and other pitfalls. It describes a way to prolong existence of a primordially mortal man. A lie is a lie, but there's a hint in it, as they say.
There is another way, in DNA of each cell there is a site which with each division of this cell shortens, it is responsible for the number of cell divisions, as soon as this site exhausts itself, the cell will divide with defects, or in general dies. If there is a majority of such depleted cells, then the organism dies of old age. And here the thought occurs - why not to tweak the genome a bit so that with each division of cells this part of the cell does not become shorter? It promises eternal youth.
But the question arises: a man begins with one single cell and the cells specialize and form organs and the organism in general. But after such interference we may get just a piece of protoplasm with ever-dividing identical cells? Who will need it? And even if we receive a complete organism, can we consider it human? After all, genetically it is not a descendant of its ancestors at all. This will not save us from various illnesses and diseases including those acquired in addition to changes in genome.
Legally it is rather a clone or a mutant and their rights are not described anywhere, because human cloning is forbidden everywhere.
But there is also an ethical side, the psychology of ordinary people. In general, one must begin from laws and psycho-type corrections for all population of the planet, a great brainwashing must be done to psychologically prepare common people for such GMO-replacers. Otherwise there will be uprisings, wars and all the other "charms" of social and material inequality.
And the "eternal" must also be somehow limited in the sense of reproduction, or the ball will not feed all, it is also to change the genome, so that, for example, ovulation depending on the population, if individuals are a billion - no more reproduction, until someone dies.
And you are going to solve all these issues within one country, even one organization, somewhere in the periphery? With money from forex trading, not even the stock exchange? It's petty, any corporation would crush it and not notice.
And you are going to solve all these issues within one country, even one organisation, somewhere in the suburbs? With money from forex trading, not even on the stock exchange? It's petty, any corporation would crush it and not notice.
The company is expected to sponsor scientists and research in this area. And to oversee the resolution of related issues.
How much money would this require, from your point of view?
Watch the Discovery film"Why? Questions of the Universe. Can we live forever?"It talks about brain capacity and other pitfalls. There is a description of a way to prolong existence of a primordially mortal man. A lie is a lie, but there's a hint in it, as they say.
There is another way, in the DNA of each cell there is a site that with each division of the cell is shortened, this is responsible for the number of cell divisions, as soon as this site is exhausted, the cell will divide with defects, or even die. If there is a majority of such depleted cells, then the organism dies of old age. And here the thought occurs - why not to tweak the genome a bit so that with each division of cells this part of the cell does not become shorter? It promises eternal youth.
But the question arises: a man begins with one single cell and the cells specialize and form organs and the organism in general. But after such interference we may get just a piece of protoplasm with constantly dividing cells? Who will need it? And even if we receive a complete organism, can we consider it human? After all, genetically it is not a descendant of its ancestors at all. This will not save us from various illnesses and diseases which we have got together with changes in genome.
Well, legally it is more of a clone - a mutant, and their rights are not described anywhere, because human cloning is prohibited everywhere.
And there is also the ethical side, the psychology of ordinary people. In general, one must begin with laws and psycho-type corrections for all population of the planet, great brainwashing must be done to psychologically prepare common people for such GMO-receivers. Otherwise, there will be revolts, wars and all the other "charms" of social and material inequality.
And you are going to solve all these issues within one country, even one organization, somewhere in the periphery? With money from forex trading, not even the stock exchange? It's petty, any corporation would crush it and not notice.
Here, let's assume that all problems are solvable and it is possible to give eternal life to any man and give him a choice when to stop aging (that is eternal old age). Such a person stops aging at the age of 45, the prime of life. Ah, yes, he has children, wife, other relatives and loved ones. They age before his eyes and die one by one (let us assume that they are all in good health and all die of old age), and then their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc. Would you agree to live and watch this? I am not. And very few are such selfish persons who are indifferent to the fate of relatives and close people and just to those people I would not like to give immortality.
Suggest to add to the number of chosen and relatives, at least those who are known and dear to this person? So, in fact most part of population of the planet will turn out very quickly to be chosen (because the primordial immortal will be far from one), and there up to overpopulation is not far away.
Here on more pressing questions, like any diseases (incurable or simply annoying to humanity) corporations do not care, because they do not benefit from eradication, they need endless struggle, and the more expensive medicine. It is like with crime, you have to fight, but do not fight to eradicate, we will not allow to destroy the system. And you too will either be bought or crushed, because you will fight the system. They will buy you or they will force to prolong life for the chosen ones, but they will be chosen not by you, but by those who have influence and power. Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Khodorkovsky and other Putin's and Obamas will live happily ever after and the rest will be ranked as servants and working animals.
Mankind does not deserve immortality, we have to change a lot in us for that.
And what's interesting, mind you. Not one even a trashy button-pusher wrote. Me, me take me.
Just wondering what more people don't believe in. In immortality or in a profitable advisor.
It would be a good start to clarify what the 'immortality' thing is. Matrix? Unkillable immunity + regeneration? Cellular aging shutdown? Or more of everything without the bread?
It would be a good start to clarify what the 'immortality' thing is. Matrix? Unkillable immunity + regeneration? Cellular aging shutdown? Or more of everything without bread?
To get a better understanding of the scientific interpretation of the question, you can read this:http://www.scienceagainstaging.com/Books/Program_HLEP-2010_RUS.pdf