What's new in MetaTrader 4 and MQL4 - big changes on the way - page 19

New comment
 

And once again, I will repeat my request:

Increase the number of buffers in the indicators. The current limit of 8 buffers makes it very inconvenient to build complex calculation schemes.

 
Where can I download a test terminal? the link at the bottom of the forum installs a terminal with a teletrade server
 
avtomat:

And once again, I will repeat my request:

Increase the number of buffers in the indicators. The current limit of 8 buffers makes it very inconvenient to build complex calculation schemes.


It will, they promised.
 
Zhunko:
You can get everything in the data window.

Do you mean through Win API? But this method is not part of MQL4 and it will not be universal: if the window class is changed in the next build, the application has to be updated. I meant the MQL4 standard way. This is the MQL4 standard way.
 
avtomat:


Zhunko; You can get everything in the data window.

It's not hard to build a function.

.

here's a simple substitution.


What's this about? The question was this:

A program is started. The user then attaches indicators to the chart, even the standard ones. How to get, using only MQL4 tools:

1. Names of attached indicators.

2. Indicators parameters.

3. Values of different buffers of these indicators on arbitrary bars.

 
Well, if so, I was wrong.
 
avtomat:
well, if so, I was wrong.


Phew)))

Because I thought I'd missed some points...

 
avtomat:


Zhunko; You can get everything in the data window.

It's not hard to build a function.

.

here's a simple substitution


Thanks, I've been struggling with this for a long time.
 
Al_Key:

Thank you, I have been missing it for a long time.


You're welcome.

.


Scriptong:

What was that about? The question was this:

A programme is started. The user then attaches indicators to the chart, even the standard ones. How to get, using only MQL4 tools:

1. Names of attached indicators.

2. Indicators parameters.

3. Values of various buffers of these indicators on arbitrary bars.


So, I have not made a mistake in understanding the question ;)

 
avtomat:


So I was not mistaken in my understanding of the question asked ;)

It's all over the internet. Everyone is used to it: one is about Thomas, the other about Yeremma, and the third about "a beast unknown to science").
1...121314151617181920212223242526...66
New comment