End of trend (indicator) - page 6

 
By the way, and Yusuf hasn't been heard from for a while now.... It's likely that a facepalm has finally come to him.
 
DYN:
The idea is far from meaningless. Write a robot and test it, it's not difficult.

And after you lose it, ask yourself the question - Why the fuck am I trading on a Markov random?
 
DYN:
And after draining, ask yourself the question - Why the fuck am I trading on Markov Random?


no plummeting with mani-management?)
 

The principle of drawing the lines is simple. According to the "end of trend" rule, 2 candles are in a flat trend, and the 3rd candle is already in a flat after a 2 candle flat. To understand the larger you need to understand the smaller. The indicator draws on the highs and lows. If you start by drawing by candlesticks, you'll get the following:

Yellow lines - by the highs, red lines - by the lows.

Then we will make "breakaway" lines to be drawn as dotted lines and, consequently, solid lines will be "non-breakaway".

There is only correction of lines to be done). Approximately the same principle is used to draw manually...

Files:
 
Why do you use the term "non-breakdown" and not "breakdown"? Or are you substituting a combination of the two terms - breakdown and false breakdown - for 'non-breakdown'?
 
khorosh:
Why do you use the term "non-breakdown" and not "breakdown"? Or are you substituting a combination of two concepts - breakdown and false breakdown - for "no breakdown"?

They are just concepts.
 
JLY:

The principle of drawing the lines is simple. According to the "end of trend" rule, 2 candles are in a flat trend, and the 3rd candle is already in a flat after a 2 candle flat. To understand the larger you need to understand the smaller. The indicator draws on the highs and lows. If you start by drawing by candlesticks, you'll get the following:

Yellow lines are highs, red lines are lows.

Then let's make "breakaway" lines be drawn as dotted lines, hence solid lines are "not breakaway".

There is only correction of lines to be done). Approximately the same principle is used to draw manually...


Here are two graphs. What algorithm do you use to...so to speak - cut off the excess.
 
Al_Key:

Here are two graphs. What algorithm do you...so to speak - cut off the excess.
The same algorithm as lightning strikes. As the lines are drawn on these two graphs, so the excess is cut off...
 
JLY:
Same algorithm as lightning strikes. As the lines were drawn on the two graphs, the extra ones are cut off...


Ok, draw a finished pattern (with no extras) for 4 hours ahead on the five-minute charts. Lay it out so that by the time of the post you can check if you got it right. Then there will be more interest in you and your topic. You may post your daily papers and then wait for years.

Z.O..

As far as I know, lightning strikes randomly. Or does Zeus strike it according to certain principles?

 
Al_Key:

Ok, draw a finished picture (without the extra stuff) for 4 hours ahead on the five minutes. Post it so that by the time of the post you can check if you got it right. Then there will be more interest in you and your topic. You may post your daily papers and then wait for years.

Z.O.

As far as I know, lightning strikes randomly. Or does Zeus strike it according to certain principles?


What rule do you want to check?)

Not Zeus, Jesus.