![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As I wrote before, isn't a Martin a kind of MM, can't a matrin have a dynamic parameter to change the lot increment? Martin is worse because the distribution is not normal in the market. That's why anti-martin looks better than martin. If you achieve with your trades an increase in equity that is close to the normal, the Martin is better. Martin is the same as MM, it's like comparing a wand and a cake filter, but one has an impulse characteristic - like a straight line (e.g. linear weighted wand), someone has an impulse characteristic in the form of damped oscillations, whatever. Imagine a filter system consisting of such filters applied to each other with impulse characteristics connected by a certain function, for example, the AFC. I do not know if it was done intentionally or not; we will not discuss dynamic parameters of martin + StopLoss and TP in addition to them.
And as I said before Chaos has its own regularities, so if you find these regularities then the martin will be a great helper
FEAR, now if we consider the zig-zag, the following is suggested. Given the dependence of the drunken sailor formula. Let's gather statistics of the zigzag knees, built by no rolls. for example, let's take the zigzag described here, in a branch about a drunken sailor. And build the following tables (note that the depth of sampling will not be a constant value). So the table. Column 1 - size of the knee of the zigzag (for example 20pp 40pp 80pp 100pp...), column 2 - the number of bends (the number of smallest bends further on the column connect through the root, for the appropriate size of the bends zigzag. column 3 - depth in bars, on which is found this number of bends. (or the sum of the path of lines connecting them modulo, or the sum of the angles, different options can be considered) probably do not need to say that to gain statistics on minutes for small bends, even 20-point - problemotirno on bezotkaty, because the value of the high-loy in minutes often exceeds this threshold. In other words we can take it both ways (rise and fall, it is not known what is more important). To do it we need equal-volume bars and the time component does not matter in this case, because the statistics (jumping depth of sampling) is collected not by time but by generated tops of zigzags. By the way, we can try to form bars irregular in time through a similar mechanism, the discreteness ("TF analogues") of these bars will differ, but this TF analogy will become non-synchronous in its starts and closes relatively to a lower "TF". Thus we can even try to build our own price bars with the normal distribution. But the point is in changing the dynamics of these values.
I don't think so =))) I didn't say my system is based on the zig=zag.
By the way, why did you decide to use martingale on forex and not, for example, on roulette in the casino?
And in the casino you can use the martingale system successfully, but unfortunately we have no honest casinos, so they won't let you make money!!!
But I am curious as to the reason for this categorical statement. If you don't mind, please explain...
As one of the forum members said (sorry I don't have time to look who) Martingale is not a strategy - it's just a kind of MM, just a mathematical calculation!
The basis of this mat.... calculation should be a working strategy and if this strategy will not give 7-10 losses in a row, your deposit will steadily grow!
But do not forget that the load on the depo will also be more!!! And if you have a strategy gives more than 10 losses in a row - so it's hard to call it a strategy and Martingale also will not help!
The main thing is to take a calculator and calculate everything, and then everything becomes clear! That would be a strategy that gives a maximum of 7 losses on TF below 30M with TP and SL = 20 pips - it would be just super!