Thoughts on the random - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thank you, colleague. I have already taken everything into account. And I can even support the faith in success of those who are still in search of it with free real-time trading signals, without fear of being ridiculed. But I do not know how to arrange it, if anyone needs it...
Can't MQ Signals service do it?
In the MQ Signals service will not work?
No - I have two TSs working in my account simultaneously, each oriented to its own quotes behaviour.
Therefore, I can only post signals in a separate form from my own trading (so to speak - a special release :-).
It will be a virtual, BEGINNING from ZERO, series of trades, "clean", especially for observation...
No - I have two TS running in my account at the same time, each oriented to its own quote behaviour.
Therefore, I can only post signals in a separate form from my own trading (so to speak - a special release :-).
It will be a virtual, BEGINNING FROM ZERO, series of trades, "pure", especially for observation...
It will be interesting to see, colleague!
I can answer that too. I use statistical methods too, autocorrelation, for example. But looking for autocorrelation in quotes makes no sense any more. That was interesting 20-30 years ago. Nowadays, there are no linear dependencies in internet trading and in Forex.
It will be interesting to see, colleague!
That's a pity. I don't feel comfortable going somewhere "on the side"...
And here... for our readers... no way...?
Well, what to do.
A market is a pseudo-mechanistic shit, described by pseudonewtonian equations with non-linear terms and whatnot. In general, everything in the world is described by a single equation:
Elementary reaction (change in pseudo-momentum) = Force * Elementary time interval
We need to learn how to describe the aftermath of this news - then we'll be golden. Once we confidently detect the news and determine its strength - we know the market's behaviour for some near future.
We can try to describe it all - using a Newtonian approach. There is room for everything - the Lagrange function, harmonic oscillations, energy... The fun part is finding a force meter. And not only force, but also pseudo-momentum, which is the main characteristic of motion.
Alexei, let's say, er... a friend of mine found a meter (note, my friend, not me! - (с) ) . That is, I know, approximately, of course, that at a given moment the market is affected by a force of such-and-such magnitude. For simplicity, we take an elementary time interval equal to 1 candle. What is the next step, what is the algorithm?
Alexei, let's say, er... a friend of mine found a meter (mind you, my friend, not me! - (с) ) . That is, I know, roughly, of course, that at a given moment a force of such-and-such magnitude is affecting the market. For simplicity, we take an elementary time interval equal to 1 candle. What is the next step, what is the algorithm?
To open in the direction of the movement on retracement.
Open in the direction of the move on a correction.
(It's a tricky one. Write the following equation))
Solve the difura, of course.
But it's not all that simple there. A given market (e.g. our favourite oyra) has a "mass" that is not constant.
We take Landafschitz, vol. 1, and try to construct the "mechanics" of the market. Just thinking over every word of his textbook is a very fruitful exercise.
I never tried it, frankly speaking.
The loss is that I've lost 2.5 thousands Gs in total after 3 or 4 rounds. I played without robots, manually, very badly. I realized that manual trading was not for me. I broke all possible rules of smart trading.
Another defeat (so far unsuccessful) - the fact that I have not yet found a common approach, which I was confident in.
What I was working on... I do not care. I'm working on a new topic now anyway, and I've forgotten about the old ones (for now). But research experience tells me I'll still go back and rethink what's supposedly been done and discarded.