Which is more important - the entrance or the exit? Is the entry point even important? Is the exit point even important? - page 5

 
Azzx:
It is not possible to test input and output separately for every system.
So why don't you just give up on such a system?
 
For me, the exit is clearly more important. It is where profit or loss is made.
Addendum: The consequences of a bad entry can be neutralised by a quick exit. The consequences of an unsuccessful exit cannot be neutralised.
 

Getting in and out right is right.

The rest is wrong.

 
If your system's performance is heavily dependent on output, its inputs are likely to be badly shoddy.
 
Entries, of course, are an important consideration. With bad inputs, performance will be with a known sign. But output is more important in any system. (IMHO)
 
DmitriyN:
What are you discussing?

Waiting for the master class.

TheXpert:

I'll give my opinion later) if necessary.

 
sever32:

Personally, I'm waiting for the master class.

I'm a programmer, that's all.

You'd better ask pro-trader Dima for a master class)

Oh, and yes, I do not see the need for it yet. It's a surprisingly normal discussion.

 
TheXpert:

What a master class) I'm just a programmer.

You'd better ask pro-trader Dima for a master class)


That's why I'm on this forum, because there are programmers here.

Dima is on the lookout for one himself.

 
TheXpert:


Oh, and yes, I don't see the need yet. A surprisingly normal discussion.


There aren't many real rabble-rousers, so there aren't any ringleaders (C)
 
You should have started a theme with a cartoon :)