[Archive!] FOREX - Trends, Forecasts & Consequences (Episode 12: February 2012) - page 127

New comment
 
MobileMan:

Can you explain what this is - a troll, that's one, and two - why are you so smart here and think that I trade illiterately and you trade competently? I operate several systems, one of which is high-risk, and it can have one order per week and it increases the deposit several times at once. And there have been no misfires. Is there any forex law that says where it is competent and where it is not? I believe that if I trade in such a way that it brings profit, then I trade correctly. Just because I often trade against TA doesn't mean I'm doing it wrong. I just became disillusioned with it a long time ago and trade my own way. Is profitable illiterate?
On the internet, "trolls" are people who provoke emotional altercations, harass other users or impersonate other people. The word is not originally derived from mythological trolls but from the fishing term trolling( trawling ), but the consonance has taken root to such an extent that the identification of Internet bullies with trolls has become commonplace and even the subject of jokes and caricatures.
 
strangerr:
I'm sticking it out, volumes and history
Yeah, it's not the volumes that move the price but the history)))))))))))strangerr,by the way, the volumes really rule, or rather whoever uses them to enter the market, if these sharks did not diversify the volumes it would not be trading, it would be primary schools. ))))
 

hello everyone )))) just turned it on and immediately bought ))))

what's with the 5 stages? are there trader classes like spiders now? ))))

 
MobileMan:

Let's wait until the end of February and see who's right )))) for one thing, and for another I've always respected other people's opinions here, unlike some who don't give a fuck about mine

Let's not wait that long)))
 
MobileMan:

Can you explain what this is - a troll, that's one, and two - why are you so smart here and think that I trade illiterately and you trade competently? I operate several systems, one of which is high-risk, and it can have one order per week and it increases the deposit several times at once. And there have been no misfires. Is there any forex law that says where it is competent and where it is not? I believe that if I trade in such a way that it brings profit, then I trade correctly. Just because I often trade against TA doesn't mean I'm doing it wrong. I just became disillusioned with it a long time ago and trade my own way. Is profitable illiterate?
And who said you don't know what it is, I take it you are a free artist, an inventor of sorts:)
 
jonni:
Yeah, it's not the volumes that drive the price, it's the story)))))))))))
Knowledge will help.
 
nikelodeon:
You know how many people I've met who had no idea about market analysis, but opened shares for as much as 3,000 roubles, of course. And where are they now? Ne..... no matter what, but every trader must know the principles of technical analysis, even those who trade on the fundamentals or on their ass, as in your case. And this is not even a casino, but most likely a scam like.....

I'm not saying I don't know it. I'm past it and I'm trying to forget it. Didn't you have it at the beginning (when you don't know TA), that you traded better? Then you get TA and start to lose money, then you understand that it's all bullshit and again things go uphill. If anything, our thread is called "FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Consequences" and there's nothing about TA in the title. I made a forecast for the end of February 1.26. and there was a reaction... nonsense, etc.
 
DhP:
Knowledge will help.
Or ignorance.))
 
MobileMan:

any indicators or volumes are all BLEEP! They "predict" price behaviour based on history... And this is theoretically impossible. Think about it. How can you know approximately where the price will be tomorrow if you have data that yesterday it was there! Well, I know for certain that if a Jew needs to go down or up, it will go there, breaking any resistance and going against all the rules of technical analysis, and there are so many of them that any turn can be explained (after it has already happened). And if you take the same volumes, they cannot even be called volumes, because they do not mean volumes, but quantities.

Okay, you think that's crap. Enlighten me, kind sir, what do you think is not crap???


p.s.

 
Doesn't want to cross the fan )))) I'll wait for the next ray )))
1...120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134...793
New comment