[Archive!] FOREX - Trends, Forecasts & Consequences (Episode 12: February 2012) - page 155

[Sdimm]

artikul:

And no one knows that because it's the magic of numbers and has nothing to do with market conditions, news, volumes and so on )))

Mishkin's zero on the 4? It wasn't visible on the 5.

[artikul]

Sdimm:

Mishkin's zero on the 4 mark? You couldn't see it on the 5.

Yes ))) I'm on Insta right now)))

[rigc]

yes.... Mobile's Opa proved more sensitive than competent reasoning, Stranger no offence))))

[Sdimm]

artikul:

Yes ))) I'm on Insta now)))

The signals there are no noise and work like clockwork, this one was short by the way, which indicates a further strong impulse

[Александр Шевчук]

artikul:

Yes ))) I'm hanging out on Insta right now ))))

No, Article, the volumes don't lie, no move up until tomorrow. Gone.

[artikul]

strangerr:

No, Article, the volumes don't lie, there's no move up until tomorrow. Gone.

I didn't say they lie )))) I said there is no market justification for this signal, which, by the way, does not always work, but if it does, it gives a strong impulse )))

[artikul]

Here we go again, another terminology problem )))) Let's talk about the difference between momentum and trend. ))) I think it's obvious ))))

[MobileMan]

strangerr:

No, Article, the volumes don't lie, there's no move up until tomorrow. Gone.

they don't lie, only move up )))) against them )

[Tantrik]

strangerr:

No, Article, the volumes don't lie, there's no move up until tomorrow. Gone.

I also wondered how they could go up without freeloaders - without volumes, on pure enthusiasm.

[solar]

Leave strangerr alone, maybe the man hasn't heard of DND warrants )))))