Yusuf's floodwaters - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's probably best to insert a post (with a link to the branch). And post, of course. That makes two posts.
But if two posts to write a bummer, you can just send it here. And here to sort out.
As the club decides - so it will be.
Regarding abolk: good suggestion.
Mathemat referred me here too!
Please help with the idea at https://forum.mql4.com/ru/40781
Let's try again, calmly and undistractedly, to sort out what you suggest in the thread Your most effective strategy? It was like this:
Что такое постоянная прибыль в Вашем понимании? Объясните на пальцах или дайте формулу.
That is, if as a result of several positive trades the deposit increases, then the next entries would not depend on the size of the increased deposit, and the risk of making a loss or profit would remain constant, to exclude martingale
If you use formulas, it would seem so:
Now the amount of future profit (loss) is realised:
P(U)=Deposit*Lot*(C2-C1) - leads to martingale.
We should:
P(U)=(Deposit-(profit-loss))*Lot*(Ц2-Ц1) - never leads to martingale and the threat of being drained.
Can you please explain why your first formula necessarily leads to martingale?
I hope the members will not mind if a mathematically savvy professional is admitted to the Club? I'm all for it.
))))))
I can hear it being shouted from all over: Membership, Membership!
Let's try again, calmly and undistractedly, to sort out what you suggest in the thread Your most effective strategy? It was like this:
That is, if as a result of several positive trades the deposit increases, then the next entries would not depend on the size of the increased deposit, and the risk of making a loss or profit would remain constant, to exclude martingale
If you use formulas, it would seem so:
Now the amount of future profit (loss) is realised:
P(U)=Deposit*Lot*(C2-C1) - leads to martingale.
We should:
P(U)=(Deposit-(profit-loss))*Lot*(Ц2-Ц1) - never leads to martingale and the threat of being drained.
_________________________________________________________________
Can you please explain why your first formula necessarily leads to martingale?
))))))
I can hear the cry from everywhere: into his dicks, into his dicks!
Thanks for the encouragement, if it's not another "Annals..."
it's cooler.
it's cooler.