About the feet (for the first time) - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, 500 is unlikely. Although, you never know...
You'll have to endure 100 bad entries in a row :)
Profitability 1.78
Expectation of winning 14.55
Profitable trades (% of all) 55 (6.86%)
Losing trades (% of all) 747 (93.14%)
Largest
profitable trade 501.65
losing trade -32.54
Average
profitable trade 485.86
losing trade -20.15
Maximum
continuous wins (profit) 3 (1500.75)
continuous losses (loss) 103 (-2083.13)
Maximum
continuous gains (number of wins) 1500.75 (3)
continuous losses (number of losses) -2083.13 (103)
Average
continuous wins 1
continuous losses 18
Who is that clear to?
Your categorical nature compels me to draw conclusions about the systems to which you gravitate: you prefer short targets. But not everyone has such systems...No, they're not. I prefer goals that are comparable to the length of my life. If you're prepared to live 8--years and three years, then you will have goals to match.
No, it wouldn't. I prefer goals commensurate with the length of my life. If you're willing to live 8--years and three years, you'll have goals to match.
That's right, or there could be a duel...
________
Piss, at least it's not in verse.
With a 20 pip stop the targets can be 50 and 100 and 500. These are not related things.
Why are you writing nonsense? They are not related, except for one connection - I would like to live longer.
But as I understand it, the mathematician is a pure theorist.... he's willing to wait for the sun to go out. What a pest.
Why are you writing nonsense?
That's karma for you.)
I'm sorry.
I sympathise.
And where did that strange conclusion come from? I didn't suggest the 500 top.
What a poet, for fuck's sake... You are asking too general and 100500 times chewed question, which cannot be answered unambiguously. Focus on a particular system and optimize your stops there as much as you need.
Here's a look. According to the rules, with a short stop, I would have a minus here. Four times.
Oh, man!
Is it better to have four times 20 pips or three times fifty?
And where is this strange conclusion coming from? I didn't suggest the take 500.
What a poet, for fuck's sake... You are asking too general and 100500 times chewed question, which cannot be answered unambiguously. Focus on a particular system and optimise the stops there for as long as you need to.
I didn't ask you a "general and chewed up" question - I asked you a question you have no idea how to answer.