You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Found it on my bursa forum
It's from here.
After a pause, the two men laughed merrily.
===
It was me who was amusing myself - I was imitating Mr. Parker.
After a pause, the two men laughed merrily.
===
I was amusing myself here once - I was imitating Mr. Parker.
Cool!
But Parker would have written "men" instead of "interlocutors".
PS. And I would have called the columnist "Medveb" :)
Nice one!
But Parker would have written 'men' instead of 'interlocutors'.
PS. And I'd call the columnist "Medveb" :)
Well, I'm not Parker. I'm a grunt...
:)
You don't have to.
It's just, "interlocutors" doesn't seem Parker-ish.
:)
You don't have to.
It's just that "interlocutors" doesn't seem very Parkerian.
I agree. "Men" would be closer stylistically. But that's my text.
===
Just so there's no confusion. // got out of it, didn't I? )))
I agree. 'Men' would have been closer in style. But this is my text.
===
Not to be confused. // got out of it, didn't you? )))
I honestly thought "interlocutors" was used intentionally.
After a pause, the two men laughed merrily.
===
It was me who was amusing myself - I was imitating Mr. Parker.
=== Come on.
>
it used to be milmtion, but that's all changed now. Only the best of the best have been certified.
They may not be on duty, so they are citizens like everyone else, and they may even be employees of some information department. You can talk not only about cops, but also about the driver who took such an interest in filming all this without doing anything, and who even posted it on the internet - what a true hero.